Beyond R2D2

Robots are expected to enter the everyday lives of people to entertain, educate, or support them. It is therefore important that people can intuitively understand the behavior of robots. Oftentimes, the behavior of people is used as a model because of its familiarity. However, it is as yet unclear what the best approach is to design interaction behaviors for non-humanoid robots. In this article, we explore two different approaches toward designing behavior for a service robot. The first concerns the commonly used approach of copying human behavior as closely as possible to the robot (human-translated). The second approach was inspired by product design methods. The design of the robot's behavior was optimized for the robot's interaction capabilities and hardware modalities (robot-optimized). To evaluate people's responses to the two behavior sets for a tour guide robot, an online video study (N = 204) and a two-day in-the-wild study (N > 600) were performed. Results showed that participants responded slightly more positive to robot-optimized behavior and paid attention to robot-optimized behavior for longer. However, participants remembered more details when the robot showed human-translated behavior. Together, the studies show that it is sometimes better for non-humanoid robots to have robot-optimized behaviors rather than human-translated behaviors.

[1]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Dancing with a machine: a case of experience-driven design , 2003, DPPI '03.

[2]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Directions robot: in-the-wild experiences and lessons learned , 2014, AAMAS.

[3]  Wendy Ju Approachability : How People Interpret Automatic Door Movement as Gesture , 2008 .

[4]  Caroline Hummels Engaging Contexts to Evoke Experiences , 1999 .

[5]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Experiences with an Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[7]  Anne Haugen Gausdal,et al.  Leaders’ Influence Tactics for Safety: An Exploratory Study in the Maritime Context , 2020 .

[8]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Picking favorites: The influence of robot eye-gaze on interactions with multiple users , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[10]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[12]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers , 2000, DIS '00.

[13]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Learning-Based Modeling of Multimodal Behaviors for Humanlike Robots , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Contextual Analysis of Human Non-verbal Guide Behaviors to Inform the Development of FROG, the Fun Robotic Outdoor Guide , 2012, HBU.

[15]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Using the visitor experiences for mapping the possibilities of implementing a robotic guide in outdoor sites , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home , 2006, HRI '06.

[17]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[18]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Heeyoung Kim,et al.  Personality design of sociable robots by control of gesture design factors , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[20]  Sven Behnke,et al.  Fritz - A Humanoid Communication Robot , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  Elena Torta,et al.  Effects of Eye Contact and Iconic Gestures on Message Retention in Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[22]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Modeling and Controlling Friendliness for An Interactive Museum Robot , 2014, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[23]  Julia Fink,et al.  Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.

[24]  Catherine Courage,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION TO USER REQUIREMENTS , 2005 .

[25]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Conversational Gaze Aversion for Humanlike Robots , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Nonverbal signaling for non-humanoid robots during human-robot collaboration , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Wendy Ju,et al.  The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious , 2008, Design Issues.

[29]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Reconfiguring spatial formation arrangement by robot body orientation , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[30]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[31]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Designing robots in the wild , 2014, HRI 2014.

[32]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[33]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Snackbot: Documenting the design of a robot for long-term Human-Robot Interaction , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[34]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[35]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Precision timing in human-robot interaction: coordination of head movement and utterance , 2008, CHI.

[36]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Providing route directions: Design of robot's utterance, gesture, and timing , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[37]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[38]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Robot gestures make difficult tasks easier: the impact of gestures on perceived workload and task performance , 2014, CHI.

[39]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement , 2004, IUI '04.

[40]  C. Bartneck,et al.  A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[41]  Stella Boess,et al.  Robot Vacuum Cleaner Personality and Behavior , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[42]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[43]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  The development and testing of a product personality scale , 2009 .

[44]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[45]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[46]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  A Survey of Nonverbal Signaling Methods for Non-Humanoid Robots , 2018, Found. Trends Robotics.

[47]  Myungsuk Kim,et al.  The Usage and Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Form in Robot Design , 2009 .

[48]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[49]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[50]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  Product personality in physical interaction , 2008 .

[51]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[52]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[53]  Sven Wachsmuth,et al.  What can I do for you? Appearance and Application of Robots , 2007 .

[54]  Barton C. Massey,et al.  DESIGN METHODS , 2002 .

[55]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Rackham: An Interactive Robot-Guide , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[56]  Mason Bretan,et al.  Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[57]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Museum guide robot based on sociological interaction analysis , 2007, CHI.

[58]  D. E. Karreman,et al.  Beyond R2D2: the design of nonverbal interaction behavior optimized for robotic-specific morphologies , 2016 .

[59]  Catherine Courage,et al.  Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements Methods, Tools, and Techniques , 2005 .

[60]  Ramón Galán,et al.  Blacky, an interactive mobile robot at a trade fair , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[61]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Humanoid Robots for a Science Museum , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[62]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[63]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Towards Robot Autonomy in Group Conversations: Understanding the Effects of Body Orientation and Gaze , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[64]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[65]  B. Graf,et al.  Entertainment Robotics : Examples , Key Technologies and Perspectives , 2002 .

[66]  H. Sypher,et al.  Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook , 1994 .

[67]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A friendly gesture: Investigating the effect of multimodal robot behavior in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 RO-MAN.

[68]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Communication of Intent in Assistive Free Flyers , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[69]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[70]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[71]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[72]  Sebastian Wrede,et al.  Signaling trouble in robot-to-group interaction.emerging visitor dynamics with a museum guide robot. , 2014, HAI.

[73]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  MINERVA: a second-generation museum tour-guide robot , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[74]  Volker Graefe,et al.  Demonstrating the Humanoid Robot HERMES at an Exhibition: A Long-Term Dependability Test , 2002 .

[75]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.