Clustered and diverse transcription factor binding underlies cell type specificity of enhancers for housekeeping genes

Housekeeping genes are considered to be regulated by common enhancers across different tissues. Here we report that most of the commonly expressed mouse or human genes across different cell types, including more than half of the previously identified housekeeping genes, are associated with cell type–specific enhancers. Furthermore, the binding of most transcription factors (TFs) is cell type–specific. We reason that these cell type specificities are causally related to the collective TF recruitment at regulatory sites, as TFs tend to bind to regions associated with many other TFs and each cell type has a unique repertoire of expressed TFs. Based on binding profiles of hundreds of TFs from HepG2, K562, and GM12878 cells, we show that 80% of all TF peaks overlapping H3K27ac signals are in the top 20,000–23,000 most TF-enriched H3K27ac peak regions, and approximately 12,000–15,000 of these peaks are enhancers (nonpromoters). Those enhancers are mainly cell type–specific and include those linked to the majority of commonly expressed genes. Moreover, we show that the top 15,000 most TF-enriched regulatory sites in HepG2 cells, associated with about 200 TFs, can be predicted largely from the binding profile of as few as 30 TFs. Through motif analysis, we show that major enhancers harbor diverse and clustered motifs from a combination of available TFs uniquely present in each cell type. We propose a mechanism that explains how the highly focused TF binding at regulatory sites results in cell type specificity of enhancers for housekeeping and commonly expressed genes.

[1]  Rafael Riudavets Puig,et al.  JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  M. Spivakov,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters , 2021, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[3]  R. Guigó,et al.  Enhancers with tissue-specific activity are enriched in intronic regions , 2021, Genome research.

[4]  D. Landsman,et al.  A model of active transcription hubs that unifies the roles of active promoters and enhancers. , 2021, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  B. O’Malley,et al.  Mechanisms of enhancer action: the known and the unknown , 2021, Genome biology.

[6]  Emma K. Farley,et al.  Enhancer grammar in development, evolution, and disease: dependencies and interplay. , 2021, Developmental cell.

[7]  Ethan K. Scott,et al.  Deep conservation of the enhancer regulatory code in animals , 2020, Science.

[8]  Fidencio J. Neri,et al.  Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints , 2020, Nature.

[9]  Shaun Mahony,et al.  Sequence and chromatin determinants of transcription factor binding and the establishment of cell type-specific binding patterns. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms.

[10]  K. Adelman,et al.  Evaluating Enhancer Function and Transcription. , 2020, Annual review of biochemistry.

[11]  J. Shendure,et al.  Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers , 2020, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  Andrew A. Hardigan,et al.  Dissecting the regulatory activity and sequence content of loci with exceptional numbers of transcription factor associations , 2019, bioRxiv.

[13]  M. Greenberg,et al.  supplementary figures , 2018 .

[14]  Peter J. Scambler,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. , 2018 .

[15]  André F. Rendeiro,et al.  Functional Dissection of the Enhancer Repertoire in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  Leming Shi,et al.  A Comprehensive Mouse Transcriptomic BodyMap across 17 Tissues by RNA-seq , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Altuna Akalin,et al.  HOT or not: examining the basis of high-occupancy target regions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[18]  G. Natoli,et al.  High constitutive activity of a broad panel of housekeeping and tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements depends on a subset of ETS proteins. , 2017, Genes & development.

[19]  Jennifer A. Mitchell,et al.  Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes , 2017, Genome research.

[20]  J. Wysocka,et al.  Ever-Changing Landscapes: Transcriptional Enhancers in Development and Evolution , 2016, Cell.

[21]  Sridhar Rao,et al.  Super-Enhancers at the Nanog Locus Differentially Regulate Neighboring Pluripotency-Associated Genes. , 2016, Cell reports.

[22]  L. Pennacchio,et al.  Genetic dissection of the α-globin super-enhancer in vivo , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Ge Tan,et al.  TFBSTools: an R/bioconductor package for transcription factor binding site analysis , 2016, Bioinform..

[24]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  LOLA: enrichment analysis for genomic region sets and regulatory elements in R and Bioconductor , 2015, Bioinform..

[25]  David S. Lorberbaum,et al.  Enhancers: Holding Out for the Right Promoter , 2015, Current Biology.

[26]  C. Glass,et al.  The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  J. T. Erichsen,et al.  Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammalian Species , 2015, Cell.

[28]  Martina Rath,et al.  Enhancer–core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation , 2014, Nature.

[29]  Jennifer A. Mitchell,et al.  A Sox2 distal enhancer cluster regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation potential , 2014, Genes & development.

[30]  Bing Ren,et al.  CRISPR Reveals a Distal Super-Enhancer Required for Sox2 Expression in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  Cosmas D. Arnold,et al.  Quantitative genome-wide enhancer activity maps for five Drosophila species show functional enhancer conservation and turnover during cis-regulatory evolution , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[32]  T. Meehan,et al.  An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues , 2014, Nature.

[33]  Timothy E. Reddy,et al.  Distinct properties of cell-type-specific and shared transcription factor binding sites. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[34]  E. Levanon,et al.  Human housekeeping genes, revisited. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  J. Shendure,et al.  Massively parallel decoding of mammalian regulatory sequences supports a flexible organizational model , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Shane J. Neph,et al.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints , 2012, Nature.

[37]  Kevin Y. Yip,et al.  Classification of human genomic regions based on experimentally determined binding sites of more than 100 transcription-related factors , 2012, Genome Biology.

[38]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type–specific transcription factor binding , 2012, Genome research.

[39]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[40]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[41]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif , 2011, Bioinform..

[42]  R. Young,et al.  Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  A. Visel,et al.  ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[44]  American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Orga ASN-0002 Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[45]  Wendy A. Bickmore,et al.  Transcription factories: gene expression in unions? , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[47]  S. Priglinger,et al.  Differential protein profiling of primary versus immortalized human RPE cells identifies expression patterns associated with cytoskeletal remodeling and cell survival. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[48]  B. Oostra,et al.  A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[49]  F. Grosveld,et al.  The human beta-globin gene 3' enhancer contains multiple binding sites for an erythroid-specific protein. , 1988, Genes & development.

[50]  James T Kadonaga,et al.  Perspectives on the RNA polymerase II core promoter , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[51]  Wouter de Laat,et al.  The β-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation , 2003, Nature Genetics.