An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems

Abstract Interest in power-to-gas (P2G) as an energy storage technology is increasing, since it allows to utilise the existing natural gas infrastructure as storage medium, which reduces capital investments and facilitates its deployment. P2G systems using renewable electricity can also substitute for fossil fuels used for heating and transport. In this study, both techno-economic and life cycle assessment (LCA) are applied to determine key performance indicators for P2G systems generating hydrogen or methane (synthetic natural gas – SNG) as main products. The proposed scenarios assume that P2G systems participate in the Swiss wholesale electricity market and include several value-adding services in addition to the generation of low fossil-carbon gas. We find that none of the systems can compete economically with conventional gas production systems when only selling hydrogen and SNG. For P2G systems producing hydrogen, four other services such as heat and oxygen supply are needed to ensure the economic viability of a 1 MW P2H system. CO2 captured from the air adds $50/MW ht of extra levelised cost to SNG compared to CO2 supplied from biogas upgrading plants and it does not offer an economic case yet regardless of the number of services. As for environmental performance, only the input of “clean” renewable electricity to electrolysis result in environmental benefits for P2G compared to conventional gas production. In particular, more than 90% of the life cycle environmental burdens are dominated by the electricity supply to electrolysis for hydrogen production, and the source of CO2 in case of SNG.

[1]  Zucker Andreas,et al.  Assessing Storage Value in Electricity Markets: A literature review , 2013 .

[2]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Integration of Wind Energy, Hydrogen and Natural Gas Pipeline Systems to Meet Community and Transportation Energy Needs: A Parametric Study , 2014 .

[3]  V. Uusitalo,et al.  Potential for greenhouse gas emission reductions using surplus electricity in hydrogen, methane and methanol production via electrolysis , 2017 .

[4]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Minimum-cost district heat production systems of different sizes under different environmental and social cost scenarios , 2014 .

[5]  Markus Lehner,et al.  Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Models , 2014 .

[6]  I. Dincer,et al.  Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability , 2015 .

[7]  Gerda Gahleitner.  Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications , 2013 .

[8]  Erik Wilhelm,et al.  Transition to hydrogen : pathways toward clean transportation , 2011 .

[9]  Carlos Peregrina,et al.  Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology , 2017 .

[10]  F. Gutiérrez-Martín,et al.  Power-to-SNG technology for energy storage at large scales , 2016 .

[11]  Johannes Lindorfer,et al.  Global warming potential of hydrogen and methane production from renewable electricity via power-to-gas technology , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Johannes Lindorfer,et al.  Evaluating CO2 sources for power-to-gas applications – A case study for Austria , 2015 .

[13]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Techno-economic implications of the electrolyser technology and size for power-to-gas systems , 2016 .

[14]  Reinerus Benders,et al.  The application of power-to-gas, pumped hydro storage and compressed air energy storage in an electricity system at different wind power penetration levels , 2014 .

[15]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  Practical operation strategies for pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES) utilising electricity price arbitrage , 2011 .

[16]  Matteo C. Romano,et al.  Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment , 2015 .

[17]  Kathrin Volkart,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications , 2017 .

[18]  Philippe A. Tanguy,et al.  Hydrogen mobility from wind energy – A life cycle assessment focusing on the fuel supply , 2016 .

[19]  H. Gorgun.  Dynamic modelling of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer , 2006 .

[20]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part I: electricity generation , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Effect of tariffs on the performance and economic benefits of PV-coupled battery systems , 2016 .

[22]  David Parra Mendoza.  Optimum community energy storage for end user applications , 2014 .

[23]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  State-of-the-art of commercial electrolyzers and on-site hydrogen generation for logistic vehicles in South Carolina , 2015 .

[24]  P. Mulheran,et al.  Towards an objective method to compare energy storage technologies: development and validation of a model to determine the upper boundary of revenue available from electrical price arbitrage , 2012 .

[25]  Aoife Foley,et al.  A multi vector energy analysis for interconnected power and gas systems , 2017 .

[26]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power to Gas: Technological Overview, Systems Analysis and Economic Assessment , 2015 .

[27]  W. Short,et al.  A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies , 1995 .

[28]  Adrian Ilinca,et al.  Energy storage systems—Characteristics and comparisons , 2008 .

[29]  Aldo Coghe,et al.  Behavior of hydrogen-enriched non-premixed swirled natural gas flames , 2006 .

[30]  M. Lieberman.  Market Growth, Economies of Scale, and Plant Size in the Chemical Processing Industries , 1987 .

[31]  Hannes Weigt,et al.  Swissmod - A Model of the Swiss Electricity Market , 2014 .

[32]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[33]  Ramchandra Bhandari,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis – a review , 2014 .

[34]  Fanhua Ma,et al.  Hydrogen-Enriched Compressed Natural Gas as a Fuel for Engines , 2010 .

[35]  D. Parra,et al.  The role of hydrogen in achieving the decarbonization targets for the UK domestic sector , 2014 .

[36]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[37]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .