Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization

In an online convex optimization problem a decision-maker makes a sequence of decisions, i.e., chooses a sequence of points in Euclidean space, from a fixed feasible set. After each point is chosen, it encounters a sequence of (possibly unrelated) convex cost functions. Zinkevich [Zin03] introduced this framework, which models many natural repeated decision-making problems and generalizes many existing problems such as Prediction from Expert Advice and Cover’s Universal Portfolios. Zinkevich showed that a simple online gradient descent algorithm achieves additive regret$O({\sqrt{T}})$, for an arbitrary sequence of T convex cost functions (of bounded gradients), with respect to the best single decision in hindsight. In this paper, we give algorithms that achieve regret O(log(T)) for an arbitrary sequence of strictly convex functions (with bounded first and second derivatives). This mirrors what has been done for the special cases of prediction from expert advice by Kivinen and Warmuth [KW99], and Universal Portfolios by Cover [Cov91]. We propose several algorithms achieving logarithmic regret, which besides being more general are also much more efficient to implement. The main new ideas give rise to an efficient algorithm based on the Newton method for optimization, a new tool in the field. Our analysis shows a surprising connection to follow-the-leader method, and builds on the recent work of Agarwal and Hazan [AH05]. We also analyze other algorithms, which tie together several different previous approaches including follow-the-leader, exponential weighting, Cover’s algorithm and gradient descent.

[1]  James Hannan,et al.  4. APPROXIMATION TO RAYES RISK IN REPEATED PLAY , 1958 .

[2]  Kurt S. Riedel,et al.  A Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury Identity for Rank Augmenting Matrices with Application to Centering , 1992, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[3]  Pravin M. Vaidya,et al.  A new algorithm for minimizing convex functions over convex sets , 1996, Math. Program..

[4]  A. Blum,et al.  Universal portfolios with and without transaction costs , 1997, COLT '97.

[5]  Manfred K. Warmuth,et al.  Averaging Expert Predictions , 1999, EuroCOLT.

[6]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Efficient algorithms for universal portfolios , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  James C. Spall,et al.  Introduction to stochastic search and optimization - estimation, simulation, and control , 2003, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization.

[8]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Simulated annealing in convex bodies and an O*(n/sup 4/) volume algorithm , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[9]  S. Vempala,et al.  The Geometry of Logconcave Functions and an O* (n 3 ) Sampling Algorithm , 2003 .

[10]  Martin Zinkevich,et al.  Online Convex Programming and Generalized Infinitesimal Gradient Ascent , 2003, ICML.

[11]  Adam Tauman Kalai,et al.  Online convex optimization in the bandit setting: gradient descent without a gradient , 2004, SODA '05.

[12]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Efficient algorithms for online decision problems , 2005, Journal of computer and system sciences (Print).

[13]  Elad Hazan,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Online Game Playing and Universal Portfolio Management , 2006, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[14]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Simulated annealing in convex bodies and an O*(n4) volume algorithm , 2006, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[15]  Gábor Lugosi,et al.  Prediction, learning, and games , 2006 .