Factors in capital decisions involving advanced manufacturing technologies

This paper presents an integrated framework for the selection of attributes used in the evaluation of advanced manufacturing systems. The primary focus in the development of this framework is the modularity of the framework so that it is applicable to a wide range of advanced manufacturing systems with differing process configurations and technologies. Based on data collected from industry and the current body of knowledge, decision attributes were identified and ranked relatively against each other, forming a hierarchy of decision attributes. To simplify the hierarchy, making it more user‐friendly in real‐world applications, each decision attribute was also evaluated relative to the strength of its relationships to other decision attributes. Several decision attributes were found to be highly correlated with others, resulting in a new, single decision attribute. The final decision attribute hierarchy provides managers responsible for making capital decisions involving advanced manufacturing technologies with a framework for their decision making.

[1]  Young K. Son,et al.  A cost estimation model for advanced manufacturing systems , 1991 .

[2]  David A. Garvin.  Operations Strategy: Text and Cases , 1991 .

[3]  Young K. Son,et al.  Economic measure of productivity, quality and flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems , 1987 .

[4]  A. Freeny,et al.  Statistical Principles for Research Design and Analysis , 1994 .

[5]  G. Michael,et al.  Economic justification of modern computer-based factory automation equipment: A status report , 1985 .

[6]  B. Blanchard,et al.  Life-cycle cost and economic analysis , 1991 .

[7]  Sabah U. Randhawa,et al.  Evaluating automated manufacturing technologies: Part I — Concepts and literature review , 1992 .

[8]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  Measurement of processing flexibility in flexible manufacturing cells , 1992 .

[9]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Towards an integrated evaluation of flexible automation investments , 1990 .

[10]  U. Bertelè,et al.  Measuring the economic effectiveness of flexible automation: a new approach , 1989 .

[11]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Progress toward the “factory of the future” , 1984 .

[12]  J. Meredith,et al.  Justifying new manufacturing systems: a managerial approach , 1990 .

[13]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey , 1989 .

[14]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[15]  Young K. Son,et al.  An economic evaluation model for advanced manufacturing systems using activity-based costing , 1988 .

[16]  Jack R. Mkrkdtth,et al.  Justification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologies , 1986 .

[17]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  Management of Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Strategy, Organization, and Innovation , 1992 .

[18]  Suebsak Nanthavanij.  On Safety of Workers in FMS Environments , 1992 .

[19]  Joseph Sarkis.  EVALUATING FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS ALTERNATIVES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[20]  Ann Majchrzak.  The Human Side of Factory Automation: Managerial and Human Resource Strategies for Making Automation Succeed , 1988 .

[21]  Roger N. Wabalickis.  Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[22]  J. Hsu.  Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods , 1996 .

[23]  Byoung Kyu Choi,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE FLEXIBILITY VALUE IN AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[24]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[25]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  A framework for understanding flexibility of manufacturing systems , 1989 .

[26]  Christopher T. Hill.  New manufacturing paradigms , 1992 .