Discrete approximations to real-valued leaf sequencing problems in radiation therapy

For a given mxn nonnegative real matrix A, a segmentation with 1-norm relative error e is a set of pairs (@a,S)={(@a"1,S"1),(@a"2,S"2),...,(@a"k,S"k)}, where each @a"i is a positive number and S"i is an mxn binary matrix, and e=|A-@?"i"="1^k@a"iS"i|"1/|A|"1, where |A|"1 is the 1-norm of a vector which consists of all the entries of the matrix A. In certain radiation therapy applications, given A and positive scalars @c,@d, we consider the optimization problem of finding a segmentation (@a,S) that minimizes z=@?"i"="1^k@a"i+@ck+@de subject to certain constraints on S"i. This problem poses a major challenge in preparing a clinically acceptable treatment plan for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and is known to be NP-hard. Known discrete IMRT algorithms use alternative objectives for this problem and an L-level entrywise approximation A@? (i.e. each entry in A is approximated by the closest entry in a set of L equally-spaced integers), and produce a segmentation that satisfies A@?=@?"i"="1^k@a@?"iS"i. In this paper we present two algorithms that focus on the original non-discretized intensity matrix and consider measures of delivery quality and complexity (@?@a"i+@ck) as well as approximation error e. The first algorithm uses a set partitioning approach to approximate A by a matrix A@? that leads to segmentations with smaller k for a given e. The second algorithm uses a constrained least square approach to post-process a segmentation {(@a@?"i,S"i)} of A@? to replace @a@?"i with real-valued @a"i in order to reduce k and e.

[1]  Horst W. Hamacher,et al.  Minimizing beam‐on time in cancer radiation treatment using multileaf collimators , 2004, Networks.

[2]  S Webb Direct aperture optimization for a variable aperture collimator for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M. Langer,et al.  Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators. , 2001, Medical physics.

[4]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation : an alternative to tomotherapy , 2002 .

[5]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  C. Yu,et al.  Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization. , 2001, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  P M Evans,et al.  The optimum intensities for multiple static multileaf collimator field compensation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  A L Boyer,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[10]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  Decomposition of integer matrices and multileaf collimator sequencing , 2005, Discret. Appl. Math..

[11]  Warren D D'Souza,et al.  A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  W. Que Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[13]  Shuang Luan,et al.  A new MLC segmentation algorithm/software for step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. , 2004, Medical physics.