How carbon offsetting scheme impacts the duopoly output in production and abatement: analysis in the context of carbon cap-and-trade

Abstract In the context of addressing climate change, the carbon emission trading scheme has become one of the main measures adopted by many countries and regions to achieve emission reduction goals. Noticing this current lack of research, based on a duopoly model, this paper quantitatively explores the impact of carbon offsetting scheme on both emission trading participants' profits and industry's output by drawing on advanced experience of carbon offsetting scheme from developed countries, such as US, Switzerland and EU, and thus provides a perspective for government to design optimal aggregate standard for carbon cap-and-trade. Results show a negative correlation between enterprises' carbon intensity and their equilibrium output in the product market, and indicate a threshold for the relative magnitude of the duopoly enterprises' carbon intensity, above which their absolute output will differ dramatically. The incorporation of carbon offsetting scheme into a non-offset quota trading scheme will reduce its equilibrium carbon price, thereby mitigate its negative impact on industry's total output in the product market by an either linear or quadratic form, depending on the design for the proportion ceiling of offsetting quota.

[1]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO2 emission reduction quota trading in China , 2013 .

[2]  H. Kang,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Offset Standards for Forest Projects , 2012 .

[3]  M. Lazarus,et al.  A ton is not always a ton: A road-test of landfill, manure, and afforestation/reforestation offset protocols in the U.S. carbon market , 2013 .

[4]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Carbon trading: Current schemes and future developments , 2011 .

[5]  Trading carbon tradable offsets under Kyoto's clean development mechanism: the economic advantages to buyers and sellers of using call options , 2001 .

[6]  Ger Klaassen,et al.  Testing the theory of emissions trading: Experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading , 2005 .

[7]  C. Hepburn,et al.  The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices , 2006 .

[8]  Alice Leblanc Issues related to including forestry-based offsets in a GHG emissions trading system , 1999 .

[9]  F. Ramôa Ribeiro,et al.  Assessment of the impact of the European CO2 emissions trading scheme on the Portuguese chemical industry , 2010 .

[10]  H. Seip,et al.  CLEANER PRODUCTION AS CLIMATE INVESTMENT—INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT IN TAIYUAN CITY , 2005 .

[11]  Jacek P. Siry,et al.  Urban forests' potential to supply marketable carbon emission offsets: A survey of municipal governments in the United States , 2010 .

[12]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Summary for policy makers , 2011 .

[13]  Richard K. Morse,et al.  Addressing carbon Offsetters’ Paradox: Lessons from Chinese wind CDM , 2013 .

[14]  J. Holden,et al.  Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration? , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens’ participation in CO2 emissions trading: An efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[16]  H. Kang,et al.  Study on the Analysis of Forest Sink Policy against Climate Change in Major Countries , 2012 .

[17]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[18]  K. Rennings,et al.  Costs and competitiveness effects of the European Union emissions trading scheme , 2007 .

[19]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  The construction of Shenzhen׳s carbon emission trading scheme , 2014 .

[20]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Eftichios S. Sartzetakis,et al.  On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Emission Permits , 2004 .

[22]  Ichiro Satoh,et al.  RFID-enabled carbon offsetting and trading , 2013, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[23]  Japanese citizens’ preferences regarding voluntary carbon offsets: an experimental social survey of Yokohama and Kitakyushu , 2013 .

[24]  George MacKerron,et al.  Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK , 2009 .

[25]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Planning carbon emission trading for Beijing's electric power systems under dual uncertainties , 2013 .

[26]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Economic and energy impacts from participation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative: A case study of the State of Maryland , 2008 .

[27]  I. Ari Voluntary emission trading potential of Turkey , 2013 .

[28]  Noim Uddin,et al.  Emission trading schemes – avenues for unified accounting practices , 2013 .

[29]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  The Trouble with Voluntary Emissions Trading: Uncertainty and Adverse Selection in Sectoral Crediting Programs , 2012 .

[30]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .