A one-piece 3D printed flexure translation stage for open-source microscopy.

Open source hardware has the potential to revolutionise the way we build scientific instruments; with the advent of readily available 3D printers, mechanical designs can now be shared, improved, and replicated faster and more easily than ever before. However, printed parts are typically plastic and often perform poorly compared to traditionally machined mechanisms. We have overcome many of the limitations of 3D printed mechanisms by exploiting the compliance of the plastic to produce a monolithic 3D printed flexure translation stage, capable of sub-micron-scale motion over a range of 8 × 8 × 4 mm. This requires minimal post-print clean-up and can be automated with readily available stepper motors. The resulting plastic composite structure is very stiff and exhibits remarkably low drift, moving less than 20 μm over the course of a week, without temperature stabilisation. This enables us to construct a miniature microscope with excellent mechanical stability, perfect for time-lapse measurements in situ in an incubator or fume hood. The ease of manufacture lends itself to use in containment facilities where disposability is advantageous and to experiments requiring many microscopes in parallel. High performance mechanisms based on printed flexures need not be limited to microscopy, and we anticipate their use in other devices both within the laboratory and beyond.

[1]  Darrel C. Ince,et al.  The case for open computer programs , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Two-axis flexure hinges with axially-collocated and symmetric notches , 2003 .

[3]  Wei-Chuan Shih,et al.  Fabricating optical lenses by inkjet printing and heat-assisted in situ curing of polydimethylsiloxane for smartphone microscopy , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Stephan Preibisch,et al.  OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform , 2013, Nature Methods.

[5]  Jeremy J. Baumberg,et al.  Pointillist structural color in Pollia fruit , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[7]  Valérie Geertsen,et al.  3D printing for cyclonic spray chambers in ICP spectrometry , 2015 .

[8]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Yong Mo Moon,et al.  DESIGN OF LARGE-DISPLACEMENT COMPLIANT JOINTS , 2005 .

[10]  Philip J. Kitson,et al.  Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[11]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Open-Source 3D-Printable Optics Equipment , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Andreas Prlic,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  L. Tian,et al.  3D intensity and phase imaging from light field measurements in an LED array microscope , 2015 .

[14]  Tri Giang Phan,et al.  Fabricating low cost and high performance elastomer lenses using hanging droplets. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  Andrew C. Richardson,et al.  Quantifying noise in optical tweezers by allan variance. , 2009, Optics express.

[16]  Rhys Jones,et al.  RepRap – the replicating rapid prototyper , 2011, Robotica.

[17]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions , 2014 .

[18]  J. M. Paros,et al.  Flexure Pivots to Replace Knife Edge and Ball Bearing , 1965 .

[19]  Joshua M. Pearce The Benefits of Sharing—Nice Guys and Girls do Finish First , 2014 .

[20]  P. Gao,et al.  A new piezodriven precision micropositioning stage utilizing flexure hinges , 1999 .

[21]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Corner-Filleted Flexure Hinges , 2001 .