Capacity constraints, asymmetries, and the business cycle

We study how an occasionally binding capacity constraint affects the properties of business cycles. A real business cycle model is constructed where production takes place at individual plants and the number of plants operated varies over the cycle. The capacity constraint binds in states where all plants are operated. We derive the aggregate production function for this economy, which turns out to differ from the standard Cobb.Douglas function while retaining its desirable properties. The business cycle features of this one-sector growth model are similar to those of a standard real business cycle model in most respects. Our model does, however, display some properties of actual economies that standard models do not. In particular, business cycles in our model are asymmetric--troughs are deeper on average than peaks are tall. Also, labor's share of income is counter-cyclical, as it is in US data. (Copyright: Elsevier)

[1]  M. Bils,et al.  Cyclical factor utilization , 1994 .

[2]  Martin Eichenbaum,et al.  Factor Hoarding and the Propagation of Business Cycles Shocks , 1994 .

[3]  John C. Williams,et al.  Putty-clay and investment: a business cycle analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Finn E. Kydland,et al.  Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations , 1982 .

[5]  Martin Eichenbaum,et al.  Is Theory Really Ahead of Measurement? Current Real Business Cycle Theories and Aggregate Labor Market Fluctuations , 1988 .

[6]  Lawrence I. Clxistiaoo,et al.  Current Real Business Cycle Theories and Aggregate Labor Market Fiuctaationr , 1990 .

[7]  Ellen R. McGrattan,et al.  Is the stock market overvalued , 2000 .

[8]  Thomas F. Cooley Frontiers of business cycle research , 1995 .

[9]  Jeremy Greenwood,et al.  Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Real Business Cycle , 1988 .

[10]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  Economic Growth and Business Cycles , 2020, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research.

[11]  George Tauchen,et al.  Finite state markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions , 1986 .

[12]  T. Sargent,et al.  Recursive Macroeconomic Theory , 2000 .

[13]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  Hours and employment variation in business cycle theory , 1991 .

[14]  Daniel E. Sichel Business cycle asymmetry: a deeper look , 1993 .

[15]  Richard Rogerson,et al.  Indivisible labor, lotteries and equilibrium , 1988 .

[16]  Douglas M. Patterson,et al.  ARE TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS NONLINEAR? , 1999, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[17]  G. Hansen Indivisible Labor and the Business Cycle , 1985 .

[18]  Omar Licandro,et al.  Firm Heterogeneity, Capacity Utilization, and the Business Cycle☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[19]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Using Consumer Theory to Test Competing Business Cycles Models , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Thomas F. Cooley,et al.  Equilibrium business cycles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization , 1995 .

[21]  Jeremy Greenwood,et al.  On the Cyclical Allocation of Risk , 1995 .

[22]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  The Firm and the Plant in General Equilibrium , 1989 .