A Satisficing Choice Model

Although the assumption of utility-maximizing consumers has been challenged for decades, empirical applications of alternative choice rules are still very new. We add to this growing body of literature by proposing a model based on the idea of a “satisficing” decision maker. In contrast to previous models (including recent models implementing alternative choice rules), satisficing depends on the order in which alternatives are evaluated. We therefore conduct a visual conjoint experiment to collect search and choice data. We model search and product evaluation jointly and allow for interdependence between them. The choice rule incorporates a conjunctive rule for the evaluations and, contrary to most previous models, does not rely on compensatory trade-offs at all. The results strongly support the proposed model. For instance, we find that search is indeed influenced by product evaluations. More importantly, the model results strongly support the satisficing stopping rule. Finally, we perform a holdout prediction task and find that the proposed model outperforms a standard multinomial logit model.

[1]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[2]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Moment-to-Moment Optimal Branding in TV Commercials: Preventing Avoidance by Pulsing , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[3]  Sunil Gupta Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[4]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[5]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[6]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient , 1983, Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[8]  Savannah Wei Shi,et al.  Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[9]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing: Rossi/Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2006 .

[11]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[12]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Role of Forgetting in Memory-Based Choice Decisions: A Structural Model , 2004 .

[13]  R. Dawes SOCIAL SELECTION BASED ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. , 1999 .

[15]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a bayesian hidden markov model , 2003 .

[16]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models , 2006 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[18]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase , 2009 .

[19]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[21]  Angela Y. Lee Effects of Implicit Memory on Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Brand Choice , 2002 .

[22]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[23]  Haiyang Yang,et al.  Consumer Decision Making , 2015 .

[24]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Sales Effects of Attention to Feature Advertisements: A Bayesian Mediation Analysis , 2009 .

[25]  L. Brenner,et al.  Feeling and Thinking in Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Choices , 2007 .

[26]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules , 2004 .

[27]  R. Kohli,et al.  Representation and Inference of Lexicographic Preference Models and Their Variants , 2007 .

[28]  Ralf van der Lans,et al.  Research Note - Competitive Brand Salience , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Steven M. Shugan The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[31]  Peter J. Lenk,et al.  Simulation Pseudo-Bias Correction to the Harmonic Mean Estimator of Integrated Likelihoods , 2009 .

[32]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[33]  Terry Elrod,et al.  A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies , 2004 .

[34]  Leigh McAlister,et al.  Commentary - Reexamining Bayesian Model-Comparison Evidence of Cross-Brand Pass-Through , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[35]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[36]  Clyde H. Coombs Mathematical Models in Psychological Scaling , 1951 .

[37]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Competitive Brand Salience , 2009 .

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[39]  Baohong Sun Promotion Effect on Endogenous Consumption , 2005 .

[40]  Robert Sugden,et al.  OBSERVING VIOLATIONS OF TRANSITIVITY BY EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1991 .

[41]  R. Kohli,et al.  Probabilistic Subset-Conjunctive Models for Heterogeneous Consumers , 2005 .

[42]  R. Pieters,et al.  Eye-Movement Analysis of Search Effectiveness , 2008 .

[43]  Sanjoy Ghose,et al.  When Choice Models Fail: Compensatory Models in Negatively Correlated Environments , 1989 .

[44]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Chronometry of Foveal Information Extraction During Scene Perception , 1995 .

[45]  J. E. Russo,et al.  An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables , 1994 .

[46]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[47]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[48]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement , 2008 .

[49]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[50]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[51]  Joffre Swait,et al.  A NON-COMPENSATORY CHOICE MODEL INCORPORATING ATTRIBUTE CUTOFFS , 2001 .

[52]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Bayesian Model Choice: Asymptotics and Exact Calculations , 1994 .

[53]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[54]  R. Nagel,et al.  Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2011 .

[55]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: A Structural Model of Consideration Set Formation , 2003 .

[56]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention during brand choice : The impact of time pressure and task motivation , 1999 .

[57]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[58]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[59]  H. Williams,et al.  Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models☆ , 1982 .

[60]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  An Elimination by Aspects Model of Consumer Response to Promotion Calibrated on UPC Scanner Data , 1990 .

[61]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  boa: An R Package for MCMC Output Convergence Assessment and Posterior Inference , 2007 .

[62]  J. Mazanec,et al.  Consumer decision making. , 1994 .