The Effects of In-Office Reconditioning on the Slot Dimensions and Static Frictional Resistance of Stainless Steel Brackets.

INTRODUCTION Orthodontists are commonly faced with the decision of what to do with loose brackets, and with inaccurately located brackets that need repositioning during treatment. One solution is to recycle the brackets. The potential effects of reconditioning a bracket are dependent upon many factors which may result in physical changes like alteration in slot tolerance, which may influence sliding mechanics by affecting frictional resistance. AIM To study and compare the dimensional changes in the bracket slot width and depth in reconditioned brackets from unused brackets under scanning electronic microscope and to study and compare any consequent effects on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets after reconditioning and in unused brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dentarum manufactured 90 stainless steel central incisors edgewise brackets of size 0.22 X 0.030″ inch and 0° tip and 0°angulation were taken. 60 samples for measuring frictional resistance and 30 samples for measuring slot dimensions. Ortho organizers manufactured stainless steel arch wires 0.019 X 0.025″ straight lengths 60 in number were considered for measuring static frictional resistance. RESULTS The mean slot width and depth of new brackets were 0.0251″ and 0.0471″, which exceeded the manufacturers reported nominal size of 0.022″ X 0.030″, by 0.003″ and 0.017″. The reconditioned brackets demonstrated a further increase in mean slot width and depth to 0.028″ and 0.0518″ that is by 0.0035″ and 0.0047″ which is statistically significant (p=0.001, 0.002). The mean static frictional forces of the reconditioned brackets was nearly similar to that of new brackets that is 0.3167N for reconditioned brackets and 0.2613 N for new brackets. CONCLUSION Although the reconditioning process results in physical changes to bracket structure this does not appear to result in significant effect on ex-vivo static frictional resistance.

[1]  N. Bansal,et al.  The Effects of Various In-Office Reconditioning Methods on Shear Bond Strength, Morphology of Slots and Bases of Stainless Brackets: An in vitro Study , 2011 .

[2]  R P Kusy,et al.  Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  R. Kusy,et al.  Influence of force systems on archwire-bracket combinations. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  J. Nickel,et al.  Friction and orthodontic mechanics: Clinical studies of moment and ligation effects , 2003 .

[5]  S. Jones,et al.  The effects of reconditioning on the slot dimensions and static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  R. Kusy,et al.  Frictional resistances of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps. , 2001, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Aisha M Basudan,et al.  The Effects of In-office Reconditioning on the Morphology of Slots and Bases of Stainless Steel Brackets and on the Shear/Peel Bond Strength , 2001, Journal of orthodontics.

[8]  R. Nanda,et al.  Frictional resistance in orthodontic brackets with repeated use. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  J. Årtun,et al.  Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  W. Rock,et al.  Bracket recycling--who does what? , 1997, British journal of orthodontics.

[11]  P Gordon,et al.  A Study of Frictional Forces between Orthodontic Brackets and Archwires , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[12]  J. A. S. Dickson,et al.  A Comparison of the Frictional Characteristics of Five Initial Alignment Wires and Stainless Steel Brackets at Three Bracket to Wire Angulations—an in Vitro Study , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[13]  K. Postlethwaite Recycling Bands and Brackets , 1992, British journal of orthodontics.

[14]  J R Bednar,et al.  A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  R. Oliver,et al.  Distortion of edgewise orthodontic brackets associated with different methods of debonding. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  C. Matasa Pros and cons of the reuse of direct-bonded appliances. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  K L Baker,et al.  Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  J. Powers,et al.  In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[19]  W. Brantley,et al.  Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  W. Brantley,et al.  Changes in bracket slot tolerance following recycling of direct-bond metallic orthodontic appliances. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  D. J. Buchman Effects of recycling on metallic direct-bond orthodontic brackets. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.