Splashes and Ripples: Synthesizing the Evidence on the Impacts of Digital Resources

Digitised materials representing the world’s cultural heritage are part of a growing trend towards a world in which knowledge is digitally stored, available on demand, and constantly growing. As the world becomes digital and the globally connected “digital brain” holds the shared knowledge of the world, the materials of the past need to be included in order to ensure that our collective memory online encompasses not just the present and the future, but also the past.This report is an effort to begin to synthesize the evidence available under the JISC digitisation and eContent programmes to better understand the patterns of usage of digitised collections in research and teaching, in the UK and beyond. JISC has invested heavily in eContent and digitisation, funding dozens of projects of varying size since 2004. However, until recently, the value of these efforts has been mostly either taken as given, or asserted via anecdote. By drawing on evidence of the various impacts of twelve digitised resources, we can begin to build a base of evidence that moves beyond anecdotal evidence to a more empirically-based understanding on a variety of impacts that have been measured by qualitative and quantitative methods.

[1]  Lisa J. Evered,et al.  Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences. , 1990 .

[2]  Diane Harley,et al.  Use and Users of Digital Resources. , 2007 .

[3]  Melissa Terras,et al.  If You Build It Will They Come? The LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data , 2006, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[4]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: Exploring the Motivations of Citizen Science Volunteers. , 2009, 0909.2925.

[5]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  Going, Going, Gone: Lost Internet References , 2003, Science.

[6]  paola marchionni Why Are Users So Useful? User Engagement and the Experience of the JISC Digitisation Programme , 2009 .

[7]  Eric T. Meyer,et al.  Web archives: the future , 2011 .

[8]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[9]  William A Pannapacker The MLA and the Digital Humanities , 2009 .

[10]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Empowering users and their institutions:A risks and opportunities framework for exploiting the potential of the social web , 2009 .

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web intelligence analyses of digital libraries: A case study of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH) , 2007, J. Documentation.

[12]  Anton V Emmanuel The best way to predict the future is to invent it , 2012, Frontline Gastroenterology.

[13]  Melissa Terras,et al.  Reinventing Research? Information Practices in the Humanities , 2011 .

[14]  Daniel E. Atkins and John Seely Brown and Allen L. Hammond,et al.  A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities , 2007 .

[15]  Gordon Dunsire,et al.  DiSCmap: Digitisation of Special Collections: mapping, assessment, prioritisation , 2009 .

[16]  Irene M. H. Herold Digital Archival Image Collections: Who Are the Users? , 2010 .

[17]  Peter Webster,et al.  The Impact and Embedding of an Established Resource: British History Online as a Case Study: final report , 2011 .