Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact

Abstract: The use of citation counts to assess the impact of research articles is well established. However, the citation impact of an article can only be measured several years after it has been published. As research articles are increasingly accessed through the Web, the number of times an article is downloaded can be instantly recorded and counted. One would expect the number of times an article is read to be related both to the number of times it is cited and to how old the article is. This paper analyses how short-term Web usage impact predicts medium-term citation impact. The physics e-print archive -- arXiv.org -- is used to test this.

[1]  Thomas V Perneger,et al.  Competing interests: None declared. Ethical approval: Ethics committee of Côte d’Ivoire’s Ministry of Public Health and the Institutional Review Board of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2004 .

[2]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  The self-archiving initiative , 2001, Nature.

[4]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The bibliometric properties of article readership information , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Antonella De Robbio Workshop on the open archives initiative (OAI) and peer review journals in Europe , 2001 .

[7]  Simeon M. Warner arXiv, the OAI and peer review , 2001 .

[8]  Tim Brody,et al.  Prior evidence that downloads predict citations , 2004 .

[9]  Guenther Eichhorn,et al.  The NASA Astrophysics Data System : Sociology , Bibliometrics , and Impact , 2022 .

[10]  Jon M Kleinberg,et al.  Hubs, authorities, and communities , 1999, CSUR.

[11]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[12]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  CiteSeer: an autonomous Web agent for automatic retrieval and identification of interesting publications , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[13]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Can Peer Review Be Better Focused? , 2002 .

[14]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The effect of use and access on citations , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Steve Hitchcock,et al.  The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies , 2004 .