Optimizing vitamin D naming conventions in computerized order entry to support high-value care

Objective: To reduce wasteful ordering of rare 1,25-OH vitamin D lab tests through use of a noninterruptive decision support tool. Materials and Methods: We conducted a time series quality improvement study at 2 academic hospitals. The titles of vitamin D tests and the order in which they appeared in search results were changed to reflect the purpose and rarity of the tests. We used interruptive time series analyses to evaluate the changes we made. Results: The estimated number of monthly tests ordered at the 2 hospitals increased, by 24.8 and 14.2, following the introduction of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) (both P < .001). When we changed the titles of the tests, the estimated number of monthly tests decreased at the 2 hospitals, by 22.1 and 11.3 (both P < .001). The search order did not affect test utilization. Discussion: Changing catalog names in CPOE systems for infrequently used tests can reduce unintentional overuse. Users may prefer this to interruptive or restrictive interventions. Conclusion: CPOE vendors and users should refine interfaces by incorporating human factors engineering. Health care institutions should monitor test utilization for unintended changes after CPOE implementation.

[1]  Anthony C. Easty,et al.  Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets? , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  C. Naylor,et al.  Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  S. Miyakis,et al.  Factors contributing to inappropriate ordering of tests in an academic medical department and the effect of an educational feedback strategy , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[4]  T H Payne,et al.  Drug interaction alert override rates in the Meaningful Use era , 2014, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[5]  D. Potyk,et al.  Hospitalists' awareness of patient charges associated with inpatient care. , 2010, Journal of hospital medicine.

[6]  P. Froom,et al.  Cessation of dipstick urinalysis reflex testing and physician ordering behavior. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  Jianhua Li,et al.  Sharing Infobuttons to Resolve Clinicians' Information Needs , 2003, AMIA.

[8]  A. Sood,et al.  Non-evidence-based variables affecting physicians' test-ordering tendencies: a systematic review. , 2007, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[9]  Matthew D. Krasowski,et al.  Promoting improved utilization of laboratory testing through changes in an electronic medical record: experience at an academic medical center , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[10]  C. van Walraven,et al.  Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Marc Berg,et al.  Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[12]  Douglas A. Talbert,et al.  Research Paper: Interventions to Regulate Ordering of Serum Magnesium Levels: Report of an Unintended Consequence of Decision Support , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  C. Cassel,et al.  Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. , 2012, JAMA.

[14]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Influence of educational, audit and feedback, system based, and incentive and penalty interventions to reduce laboratory test utilization: a systematic review , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.