Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.

PURPOSE We have performed more than 250 radical prostatectomies using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) surgical system. Our initial cases were done using the classic Montsouris approach. However, after gaining familiarity with the robot we modified our technique to reflect our experience with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. We detail the Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy technique that we currently use. MATERIALS AND METHODS The robotic technique requires 2 teams, namely a skilled laparoscopic team at the patient and a skilled open surgeon at the console. Dissection is started anterior to the bladder and it continues extraperitoneally. The endopelvic fascia is opened and the dorsal vein complex is secured. The apex of the prostate is dissected free, releasing the neurovascular bundles at the apex. The bladder neck is then incised, and the seminal vesicles and vasa are transected. Posterior dissection is done within the posterior layer of Denonvilliers' fascia, preserving the neurovascular bundles and lateral prostatic fascia. The apex is transected and frozen sections are obtained from the parietal margins. Vesicourethral anastomosis is formed with 2 continuous sutures. RESULTS In the last 100 cases mean operative time was 2.5 hours and average blood loss was 150 ml. (range 25 to 525 cc.). Median specimen Gleason score was 7 and mean tumor volume was 7 cc. Four patients had a positive surgical margin, which was focal in 3. Of the patients 95% were discharged home within 23 hours. Mean catheterization time was 4.2 days. CONCLUSIONS Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy is a precise and safe minimally invasive technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy.

[1]  P. Walsh,et al.  Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[2]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. , 1997, Urology.

[3]  J. Rassweiler,et al.  Heilbronn Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy , 2001, European Urology.

[4]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[5]  C. Zippe,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. , 2001, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[6]  R. Myers Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy--anatomic and surgical commentary. , 2002, Urology.

[7]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Results , 2000, European Urology.

[8]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study in Men , 2001, European Urology.

[9]  P. Walsh Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Binder,et al.  Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU international.

[13]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.

[14]  M. Menon,et al.  The University of Massachusetts technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1995, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Urology.

[16]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. , 2000, The Journal of urology.