Cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis under the law of one price

To impose the law of one price (LoOP) restrictions, which state that all firms face the same input prices, Kuosmanen, Cherchye, and Sipilainen (2006) developed the top-down and bottom-up approaches to maximizing the industry-level cost efficiency. However, the optimal input shadow prices generated by the above approaches need not be unique, which influences the distribution of the efficiency indices at the individual firm level. To solve this problem, in this paper, we developed a pair of two-level mathematical programming models to calculate the upper and lower bounds of cost efficiency for each firm in the case of non-unique LoOP prices while keeping the industry cost efficiency optimal. Furthermore, a base-enumerating algorithm is proposed to solve the lower bound models of the cost efficiency measure, which are bi-level linear programs and NP-hard problems. Lastly, a numerical example is used to demonstrate the proposed approach.

[1]  Hecheng Li,et al.  Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information , 2013 .

[2]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  The law of one price in data envelopment analysis: Restricting weight flexibility across firms , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Lei Fang,et al.  A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large U.S. banks , 1997 .

[5]  A. Mostafaee,et al.  A simplified version of the DEA cost efficiency model , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of Mexican banks a total income model , 1997 .

[7]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[8]  A. Mostafaee,et al.  Cost efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with data uncertainty , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 1 Introduction: Extensions and new developments in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  William W. Cooper,et al.  EXTENSIONS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN DEA , 1996 .

[11]  Svante Ylvinger,et al.  Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: Solutions to problems in firm models , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Valentin Zelenyuk,et al.  On aggregate Farrell efficiencies , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Sung-Ko Li,et al.  Measuring the productive efficiency of a group of firms , 1995 .

[14]  P. Vanden Abeele,et al.  On research efficiency: A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management , 2005 .

[15]  R. G. Dyson,et al.  Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Charles Audet,et al.  New Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Bilevel Linear Programming , 2004 .

[17]  J. Paradi,et al.  Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank , 1997 .

[18]  Herminia I. Calvete,et al.  A new approach for solving linear bilevel problems using genetic algorithms , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Firm and industry level profit efficiency analysis using absolute and uniform shadow prices , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Firm and Industry Level Profit Efficiency Analysis Under Incomplete Price Data: A Nonparametric Approach Based on Absolute and Uniform Shadow Prices , 2006 .

[21]  Charles E. Blair,et al.  Computational Difficulties of Bilevel Linear Programming , 1990, Oper. Res..

[22]  Lei Fang,et al.  A comment on "cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis with data uncertainty" , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..