The concept of coherence in attachment interviews: Comparing attachment experts, linguists, and non-experts

Abstract Coherence is a central construct in attachment interviews. Nevertheless, the concept has never been the main focus of a study in the attachment field. The present study examined whether coherence in attachment interviews is defined differently by experts trained in attachment theory, by linguists, and by non-experts. The 72-item Coherence Q-sort (CQS) was used to determine the profile of a prototypical coherent interview. Results indicated that attachment experts could be reliably distinguished from the (combined) other groups: attachment experts emphasized quality and manner more than all other groups, linguists emphasized quantity and relevance more than attachment experts, and higher educated non-experts valued relevance more than attachment experts. Defining coherence in attachment interviews is thus more than just applying Grice's linguistic maxims; expertise in attachment theory is critical for defining interview coherence. Consequences for the coding of the AAI by non-attachment experts, as well as computer coding (im)possibilities are discussed.

[1]  L. Barone.  Developmental protective and risk factors in borderline personality disorder: A study using the Adult Attachment Interview , 2003, Attachment & human development.

[2]  J. Mey,et al.  Linguistics and pragmatics, 25 years after , 2002 .

[3]  A. Saygin,et al.  Pragmatics in human-computer conversations* , 2002 .

[4]  A. Sameroff,et al.  The stories that families tell: Narrative coherence, narrative interaction, and relationship beliefs , 2001 .

[5]  M. West,et al.  The development and preliminary validation of a new measure of adult attachment: the Adult Attachment Projective , 2001, Attachment & human development.

[6]  E Mergenthaler,et al.  The Relationship Among Attachment Representation, Emotion-Abstraction Patterns, and Narrative Style: A Computer-Based Text Analysis of the Adult Attachment Interview , 2000, Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.

[7]  Varol Akman,et al.  Turing Test: 50 Years Later , 2000, Minds and Machines.

[8]  E. Appelman.  Attachment experiences transformed into language. , 2000, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[9]  A. Sameroff,et al.  Maternal depression, family functioning, and child outcomes: a narrative assessment. , 1999, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[10]  E. Waters,et al.  Discriminant validity of the adult attachment interview. , 1996, Child development.

[11]  J. Allen,et al.  Attachment theory as a framework for understanding sequelae of severe adolescent psychopathology: an 11-year follow-up study. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  D. Rosenstein,et al.  Adolescent attachment and psychopathology. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  E. Hesse.  Discourse, memory, and the adult attachment interview : A note with emphasis on the emerging cannot classify category , 1996 .

[14]  P Fonagy,et al.  The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  J. Solomon,et al.  Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school , 1995, Development and Psychopathology.

[16]  Marinus H. van IJzendoorn.  Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: a meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview , 1995 .

[17]  R. Hobson,et al.  Personality disorder and the mental representation of early social experience , 1994, Development and Psychopathology.

[18]  P Fonagy,et al.  Maternal representations of attachment during pregnancy predict the organization of infant-mother attachment at one year of age. , 1991, Child development.

[19]  J. Mey,et al.  Computation and the soul , 1988 .

[20]  D. Blakemore.  Linguistic constraints on pragmatic interpretation: A reassessment of linguistic semantics , 1987 .

[21]  Y. Wilks.  Relevance must be to someone , 1987 .

[22]  Ruth Kempson.  Grammars as input systems , 1987 .

[23]  E. Hinkelman.  Relevance: Computation and coherence , 1987 .

[24]  F McTearMichael,et al.  Review of "Relevance , 1987 .

[25]  T. M. Horner.  Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research , 1987 .

[26]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[27]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[28]  J. Bowlby,et al.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. 3. Loss, Sadness and Depression . By John Bowlby. (Hogarth Press and Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1980.) £12.00. , 1981, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[29]  John Bowlby,et al.  Loss--Sadness and Depression , 1980 .

[30]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[31]  J. Bowlby.  Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[32]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[33]  K. Albus,et al.  Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood. , 2008 .

[34]  R. Harmon,et al.  Security in Infancy , Childhood , and Adulthood : A Move to the Level of Representation , 2007 .

[35]  D. Oppenheim,et al.  Coherence and Representations in Preschoolers' Narratives: Associations With Attachment in Infancy. , 2004 .

[36]  June Rathbone,et al.  The Adult Attachment Interview , 2001 .

[37]  Erik Hesse,et al.  The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. , 1999 .

[38]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications , 1999 .

[39]  Rachel Giora,et al.  Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory , 1997 .

[40]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[41]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[42]  M. Main.  Cross-Cultural Studies of Attachment Organization: Recent Studies, Changing Methodologies, and the Concept of Conditional Strategies , 1990 .

[43]  Jude Cassidy,et al.  Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. , 1988 .

[44]  Jay Belsky,et al.  Clinical implications of attachment , 1988 .

[45]  Pieter A. M. Seuren.  The self-styling of relevance theory [Review of the book Relevance, Communication and Cognition by Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson] , 1986 .

[46]  Jude Cassidy,et al.  Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. , 1985 .

[47]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[48]  Robert T. Craig,et al.  Conversational coherence : form, structure, and strategy , 1983 .

[49]  E. Peterfreund.  Information, systems, and psychoanalysis. An evolutionary biological approach to psychoanalytic theory. , 1971, Psychological issues.