Computer-assisted targeted therapy (CATT) for prostate radiotherapy planning by fusion of CT and MRI

In this paper, we present a comprehensive, quantitative imaging framework for improved treatment of prostate cancer via computer-assisted targeted therapy (CATT) to facilitate radiotherapy dose escalation to regions with a high likelihood of disease presence. The framework involves identification of high likelihood prostate cancer regions using computer-aided detection (CAD) classifier on diagnostic MRI, followed by mapping of these regions from MRI onto planning computerized tomography (CT) via image registration. Treatment of prostate cancer by targeted radiotherapy requires CT to formulate a dose plan. While accurate delineation of the prostate and cancer can provide reduced exposure of benign tissue to radiation, as well as a higher dose to the cancer, CT is ineffective in localizing intraprostatic lesions and poor for highlighting the prostate boundary. MR imagery on the other hand allows for greatly improved visualization of the prostate. Further, several studies have demonstrated the utility of CAD for identifying the location of tumors on in vivo multi-functional prostate MRI. Consequently, our objective is to improve the accuracy of radiotherapy dose plans via multimodal fusion of MR and CT. To achieve this objective, the CATT framework presented in this paper comprises the following components: (1) an unsupervised pixel-wise classifier to identify suspicious regions within the prostate on diagnostic MRI, (2) elastic image registration to align corresponding diagnostic MRI, planning MRI, and CT of the prostate, (3) mapping of the suspect regions from diagnostic MRI onto CT, and (4) calculation of a modified radiotherapy plan with escalated dose for cancer. Qualitative comparison of the dose plans (with and without CAD) over a total of 79 2D slices obtained from 10 MR-CT patient studies, suggest that our CATT framework could help in improved targeted treatment of prostate cancer.

[1]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer: precision of integrating functional MR imaging with radiation therapy treatment by using fiducial gold markers. , 2005, Radiology.

[2]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A multi-modal prostate segmentation scheme by combining spectral clustering and active shape models , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Improving supervised classification accuracy using non-rigid multimodal image registration: detecting prostate cancer , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  Determinations of prostate volume at 3-Tesla using an external phased array coil: comparison to pathologic specimens. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[6]  T Haycocks,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Spectral Embedding Based Probabilistic Boosting Tree (ScEPTre): Classifying High Dimensional Heterogeneous Biomedical Data , 2009, MICCAI.

[9]  L Verhey,et al.  Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Ron S. Sloboda,et al.  Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  J. F. Platt,et al.  The Accuracy of CT in the Staging of Carcinoma of the Prostate , 1989 .

[12]  M S Cohen,et al.  Rapid and effective correction of RF inhomogeneity for high field magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[13]  George Lee,et al.  Investigating the Efficacy of Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Schemes in Classifying Gene and Protein Expression Studies , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[14]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  COLLINARUS: collection of image-derived non-linear attributes for registration using splines , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Integrating structural and functional imaging for computer assisted detection of prostate cancer on multi-protocol in vivo 3 Tesla MRI , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[16]  B. McNeil,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Staging Early Prostate Cancer. Results of a Multi-Institutional Cooperative Trial , 1991, Investigative Radiology.

[17]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A hierarchical spectral clustering and nonlinear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Jianbo Shi,et al.  Graph Embedding to Improve Supervised Classification and Novel Class Detection: Application to Prostate Cancer , 2005, MICCAI.

[22]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.