Making Academic Reference Services Work

Recent discussion of reference service in academic libraries has considered alternative approaches to service and has called on academic reference librarians to play new roles. Absent from most of the discussion is an understanding that organizational changes are required if reference librarians are to accomplish what is being asked of them. Without these organizational changes these new roles and responsibilities will be impossible. To make reference service in academic libraries effective five changes are required : (1) reference librarians must be given clear budgetary and programmatic authority ; (2) the hierarchy must be flattened and reference librarians placed closer to the top of the organization ; (3) support services must be provided so that reference librarians are not encumbered by nonprofessional tasks ; (4) reference librarians should be brought together and not isolated in small departments ; and (5) public services planning and priority setting should be done by reference librarians.

[1]  Claudia Perry-Holmes,et al.  The Reference Librarian of the Future: A Scenario. , 1985 .

[2]  B. Nielsen.  Teacher or Intermediary: Alternative Professional Models in the Information Age. , 1982 .

[3]  Sheila D. Creth.  The organization of collection development : a shift in the organization paradigm , 1991 .

[4]  Holley R. Lange,et al.  INFOTRAC and WILSONDISC: A Comparison of New Technologies , 1989 .

[5]  D. L. Flarey.  Liberation Management Necessary Disorganization for the Nanosecond Nineties , 1993 .

[6]  Lewis J. Perelman.  School's Out: Hyperlearning, the New Technology, and the End of Education , 1992 .

[7]  Jerry D. Campbell.  Shaking the conceptual foundations of reference: A perspective , 1992 .

[8]  David W. Lewis.  An Organizational Paradigm for Effective Academic Libraries , 1986 .

[9]  Peggy Johnson.  Matrix Management: An Organizational Alternative for Libraries. , 1990 .

[10]  Stephen K. Stoan.  Research and Information Retrieval Among Academic Researchers: Implications for Library Instruction , 1991 .

[11]  Charles Martell,et al.  The nature of authority and employee participation in the management of academic libraries , 1987 .

[12]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  The information gateway: Designing a front‐end interface to enhance library instruction , 1992 .

[13]  Thomas L. Whisler.  Organization and Staffing of the Libraries of Columbia University: A Case Study. , 1974 .

[14]  Susan K. Martin.  Library Management and Emerging Technology: The Immovable Force and the Irresistible Object. , 1989 .

[15]  Dilys E. Morris.  Staff Time and Costs for Cataloging. , 1992 .

[16]  Fred Roecker.  The Gateway: User Education in a Changing Environment , 1992 .

[17]  Lori Arp,et al.  Connecting Bibliographic Instruction and Collection Development: A Management Plan. , 1992 .

[18]  Susan K. Martin.  Information Technology and Libraries: Toward the Year 2000 , 1989 .

[19]  B. Lynch.  Libraries as Bureaucracies. , 1979 .

[20]  Jennifer S Cargill,et al.  The Electronic Reference Desk: Reference Service in an Electronic World. , 1992 .

[21]  Gardner Hanks,et al.  An Alternative Model of a Profession for Librarians , 1975 .

[22]  David G. Null.  Robbing Peter . . . Balancing Collection Development and Reference Responsibilities , 1988 .

[23]  Michel Bauwens,et al.  The emergence of the “cybrarian”: a new organisational model for corporate libraries , 1993 .

[24]  B. B. Moran.  The Unintended Revolution in Academic Libraries: 1939 to 1989 and Beyond. , 1989 .

[25]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Liberation Management: Necessary Disorganization for the Nanosecond Nineties , 1992 .

[27]  David W. Lewis.  Research on the Use of Online Catalogs and Its Implications for Library Practice. , 1987 .

[28]  Charles Martell,et al.  The Client-Centered Academic Library: An Organizational Model , 1983 .

[29]  William A. Pettas,et al.  Conflict in the Large Academic Library: Friend or Foe?. , 1992 .