An exploratory study of public’ awareness about robotics-assisted surgery in Kuwait

Background The adoption of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) requires a clear willingness, not only from healthcare organization to operate the robotic system but also from the public that is going to perceive it. This study aims to explore public’s awareness, understanding and their perceptions towards RAS in Kuwait. Methods This cross-sectional study used a survey questionnaire that was disseminated on a tablet device to people at their convenience in governmental institutions. Results A total of 1087 people agreed to participate in this study. The study results showed that only 36.8% of respondents had heard of RAS and 27.1% knew what RAS is. Moreover, 47.6% of the respondents were uncertain about its safety, while 29.7% thought RAS was safe. The results also showed that 40.9 and 34.4% of respondents thought that RAS is more precise and faster than conventional surgical procedures, respectively, whereas 30.6% feared malfunctioning issues during surgical procedures. Conclusion This public survey among a Middle Eastern population reveals lack of awareness and limited understanding of RAS. However, there was a tendency towards believing that RAS may have potential advantages in terms of better outcomes compared to conventional surgical procedures.

[1]  A. Rosemurgy,et al.  Public Perception of LESS Surgery and NOTES , 2012, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[2]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[3]  Francesco Porpiglia,et al.  Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2013, European urology.

[4]  H. McDermott,et al.  Gender differences in understanding and acceptance of robot-assisted surgery , 2019, Journal of robotic surgery.

[5]  M. A. Elkoushy,et al.  Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: Where are we and how far can we go? , 2019, Arab journal of urology.

[6]  M. Zineddine,et al.  Attitude towards Robot Assisted Surgery: UAE context , 2013, 2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT).

[7]  Christian Heath,et al.  IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , 2009 .

[8]  J. Eastham,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[9]  M. Irani,et al.  Patient Perceptions of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gynecological Surgeries , 2016, BioMed research international.

[10]  Arif Ahmad,et al.  Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Naomi Lee.  Robotic surgery: where are we now? , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Hagen,et al.  Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Chad A. LaGrange,et al.  Malfunction of the Da Vinci robotic system during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an international survey. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[14]  E. Zoulias,et al.  Impacts of Robotic Assisted Surgery on Hospital's Strategic Plan , 2014 .

[15]  C. Fiori,et al.  Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. , 2016, European urology focus.

[16]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.