Combining Life Cycle Assessment and System Dynamics to improve impact assessment: A systematic review

Abstract Life cycle assessment has been widely applied to quantify the environmental impacts of products and processes; however recent studies highlight its limitations. Critics state that environmental impacts may be misrepresented if spatial and temporal dynamics of production systems are not accounted for. Some authors have used systems thinking methods to account for the temporal dynamics of production systems in life cycle assessment. These applications have been in the areas of solar electricity, wastewater management, electric vehicles, fly ash in cement, mobile phone waste, steel, and the long-term impacts of material sourcing amongst others. The approaches to combining systems thinking methods with life cycle assessment have been both qualitative and quantitative. Some studies have conceptualised the dynamics of systems using causal loop diagrams. They are a systems thinking tool used to map cause and effect as feedback loops that control system behaviours, nurturing a qualitative understanding of the system under study. Over sixty percent of the studies identified in this review have proceeded to using a rigorous mathematical evaluation of the system, namely, a system dynamics model in combination with life cycle assessment. This paper conducts a systematic review of efforts to combine systems thinking methods with life cycle assessment (in their various forms). In particular, it focuses on the two main approaches to combining system dynamics models and life cycle assessment: the inclusion of life cycle inventory and impact assessment factors in a system dynamics model and the inclusion of system dynamics model results in a life cycle assessment. The advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches will be discussed in this paper to provide guidance for future work.

[1]  W. Mo,et al.  Dynamic life cycle economic and environmental assessment of residential solar photovoltaic systems. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Véronique Bellon-Maurel,et al.  Coupling economic models and environmental assessment methods to support regional policies: A critical review , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Haley Jones,et al.  A system dynamics approach in LCA to account for temporal effects—a consequential energy LCI of car body-in-whites , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Jaehun Sim,et al.  The life cycle assessment of energy and carbon emissions on wool and nylon carpets in the United States , 2018 .

[6]  Sveinn Margeirsson,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Policy Changes in the Icelandic Cod Fishery Using a Hybrid Simulation Model , 2014, SIMULTECH.

[7]  Arnaud Diemer,et al.  Integrating life cycle analysis into system dynamics: the case of steel in Europe , 2019, Environmental Systems Research.

[8]  George Z. Tan,et al.  Prospective Life Cycle Assessment Based on System Dynamics Approach: A Case Study on the Large-Scale Centrifugal Compressor , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[9]  Annie McCabe,et al.  Exploring the potential of participatory systems thinking techniques in progressing SLCA , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  System dynamics modelling of product carbon footprint life cycles for collaborative green supply chains , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[11]  W. Mo,et al.  A dynamic life cycle assessment of green infrastructures. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  A review of methods for characterizing the environmental consequences of actions in life cycle assessment , 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[13]  H. H. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to system dynamics , 1967 .

[14]  Björn Frostell,et al.  Group Model-Building to identify potential sources of environmental impacts outside the scope of LCA studies , 2014 .

[15]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2011 .

[16]  Liming Yao,et al.  An integrated method of life-cycle assessment and system dynamics for waste mobile phone management and recycling in China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Project deployment strategies for community renewable energy: A dynamic multi-period planning approach , 2020, Renewable Energy.

[18]  P. Luisi,et al.  The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision , 2014 .

[19]  Alison McKay,et al.  Sustainability in the Malaysian palm oil industry , 2014 .

[20]  Arnaud Diemer,et al.  Supply chain integration strategies and circularity in the European steel industry , 2020 .

[21]  Bochao Wang,et al.  Complementing life cycle assessment by integrated hybrid modeling and simulation , 2013 .

[22]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  M A Sufian,et al.  Modeling of urban solid waste management system: the case of Dhaka city. , 2007, Waste management.

[24]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Uncertainty-embedded dynamic life cycle sustainability assessment framework: An ex-ante perspective on the impacts of alternative vehicle options , 2016 .

[25]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Dynamic evaluation of the economic and environmental impact of resource depletion for a new chemical project , 2018 .

[26]  C. Gasol,et al.  Modelling for economic cost and environmental analysis of rainwater harvesting systems , 2015 .

[27]  A. Halog,et al.  Towards better life cycle assessment and circular economy: on recent studies on interrelationships among environmental sustainability, food systems and diet , 2020 .

[28]  Danielle Maia de Souza,et al.  Quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: Application of the cascade framework to rice farming systems. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Dynamic impact assessment of resource depletion: A case study of natural gas in New Zealand , 2019, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[30]  Matthew Doolan,et al.  Interaction between New Car Design and Recycling Impact on Life Cycle Assessment , 2015 .

[31]  Sun Wei,et al.  A detailed calculation model for costing of green manufacturing , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[32]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Effective carbon emission reductions from using upgraded fly ash in the cement industry , 2015 .

[34]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Environmental management of granite slab production from an industrial ecology standpoint , 2014 .

[35]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Charting Policy Directions for Mining’s Sustainability with Circular Economy , 2016 .

[36]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integration of system dynamics approach toward deepening and broadening the life cycle sustainability assessment framework: a case for electric vehicles , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[37]  Diana Wright,et al.  Thinking in systems: a primer , 2012 .

[38]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives , 2017 .

[39]  Penny H. Y. Liu,et al.  Using a small-island pilot plant approach to analyze low-carbon emission policies , 2013 .

[40]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[41]  R. Sitzenfrei,et al.  Improving the Performance of Water Distribution Networks Based on the Value Index in the System Dynamics Framework , 2019, Water.