Evaluation of differential inoculum disk diffusion method and Vitek GPS-SA card for detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci

This study was conducted in order to compare the accuracy of detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, defined by microdilution MICs, population analyses, and mec gene hybridization, with the Vitek GPS-SA Susceptibility Card with that of the standard inoculum (10(7) CFU) and high-inoculum (10(9) CFU) disk diffusion tests. By the standard inoculum disk diffusion test, 10 of 67 (15%) isolates of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 3 of 47 (6%) isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis were falsely susceptible after 24 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. By the high-inoculum disk diffusion test (10(9) CFU), 4 of the 10 isolates of S. aureus remained falsely susceptible, whereas none of the isolates of S. epidermidis was falsely susceptible. Of the 10 isolates of S. aureus falsely susceptible by the standard disk test, only one remained falsely susceptible after an additional 24 h of incubation at 22 degrees C. All four isolates of S. aureus that were falsely susceptible by the high-inoculum disk diffusion test after 24 h of incubation at 35 degrees C became resistant after an additional 24 h of incubation at 22 degrees C. Thus, extended incubation of both the standard and high-inoculum disk diffusion tests increased their accuracy in detecting oxacillin resistance. All isolates of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci were accurately detected with the Vitek software upgrades (6.1 and 7.1) of the GPS-SA card.

[1]  R T Lally,et al.  Evaluation of the newly modified AutoMicrobic system gram-positive susceptibility-MIC card for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , 1986, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  A. Tomasz,et al.  New mechanism for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: clinical isolates that lack the PBP 2a gene and contain normal penicillin-binding proteins with modified penicillin-binding capacity , 1989, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  A. Tomasz,et al.  Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus , 1986, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  S L Hansen,et al.  Detection of intrinsically resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus with the Sceptor and AutoMicrobic systems , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  J. Waitz Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically , 1990 .

[6]  D E Low,et al.  Evaluation of commercial and standard methodology for determination of oxacillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[7]  A. Tomasz,et al.  Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  A. Tomasz,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  D Henry,et al.  Comparative evaluation of four systems for determining susceptibility of gram-positive organisms , 1986, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  Methicillin resistant staphylococci. , 1971, JAMA.