The influence of product packaging on young people's palatability rating for RTDS and other alcoholic beverages.

AIMS To investigate the influence of product packaging of ready to drink (RTD), or pre-mixed drinks, and other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages on the palatability ratings of adolescents and adults. Respondents were interviewed at their own schools or a campus of the University of NSW. The experiment tested palatability ratings in blind and non-blind conditions with a selection of 12- to 30-year-old Australians (140 adolescents and 210 adults) from seven private schools across NSW and students from the University of NSW and Macquarie University. METHODS Beverage palatability was measured utilizing an interval ratio scale from 1 to 7 before and after packaging was presented. Views on whether the beverage packaging was designed to appeal to the participant were also analysed. RESULTS In general, the alcoholic beverage packaging was thought to be designed to appeal more to adults and palatability ratings significantly increased in the non-blind conditions. In contrast, the Bacardi Breezer packaging was especially palatable to younger participants. CONCLUSIONS Although most alcoholic beverage packaging was not of particular appeal to adolescents, some RTD beverages may be appealing more to adolescents. Unlike other alcoholic products, the difference in palatability ratings for the Bacardi Breezer, from blind to non-blind conditions, was greater for younger participants.

[1]  S. Casswell,et al.  Responses to televised alcohol associated with drinking 10‐17‐year‐olds advertisem ents behaviour of , 1998 .

[2]  A. Cardello,et al.  Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations , 2000 .

[3]  Anne Marie MacKintosh,et al.  Adolescent drinking: the role of designer drinks , 1997 .

[4]  G. Hastings,et al.  Marketing alcohol to young people: implications for industry regulation and research policy. , 2000, Addiction.

[5]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Does alcohol advertising promote adolescent drinking? Results from a longitudinal assessment. , 2005, Addiction.

[6]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  The Meaning of Brand Names to Children: A Developmental Investigation , 2003 .

[7]  J. Grube,et al.  Television beer advertising and drinking knowledge, beliefs, and intentions among schoolchildren. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[8]  Matthew Q. Patterson,et al.  Taste sensitivity and aging: high incidence of decline revealed by repeated threshold measures. , 1995, Chemical senses.

[9]  H. Hill,et al.  Packaging of children’s breakfast cereal: manufacturers versus children , 2002 .

[10]  E. Austin,et al.  Targeting Adolescents? The Content and Frequency of Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Beverage Ads in Magazine and Video Formats November 1999–April 2000 , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[11]  S. Casswell Alcohol brands in young peoples' everyday lives: new developments in marketing. , 2004, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[12]  G Kobal,et al.  Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Rathouz,et al.  Alcohol advertising in magazines and adolescent readership. , 2003, JAMA.

[14]  W. Cain,et al.  Measurement of sensitivity to olfactory flavor: application in a study of aging and dentures. , 1999, Chemical senses.