Evaluating the impact of the shape of school reference buildings on bottom-up energy benchmarking

Abstract Bottom-up energy benchmarking methods use simulation of reference buildings to reproduce the building stock performance. Regressive methods using those simulated outcomes are employed to obtain typical energy performance values according to certain parameters to make the benchmarking a fair comparison. Those parameters are commonly related to the building construction aspects, operation and climate conditions. However, the building shape might play an important role in its energy performance, especially due to self-shading. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of using different reference buildings’ shapes to develop a bottom-up benchmarking of schools in Brazil. Seven reference buildings were obtained through a building stock analysis and simulated for different scenarios. Regressive benchmarking models were developed for each shape, and the impact of different building shapes was measured through a cross-validation step. Finally, an ANOVA test was applied to determine the variance of using different regressive benchmarking models in different building shapes. Results showed a significant difference in benchmarking buildings using regressions built using different shapes of reference buildings. Average RMSE ranged from 11.79 to 6.79. The best regression model was the one built using all shapes together. Additionally, results included the benchmarking models with adequate R2 (ranging from 0.725 to 0.885), and the sensitivity analysis indicates the city, the air-conditioned area and the shape as the relevant variables for benchmarking. Conclusions pointed out that the shape is an important factor in bottom-up benchmarking models and, by testing the models using actual cases, the benchmarking result might change significantly according to the reference building shape used to build the benchmarking model.

[2]  I. Hamilton,et al.  Energy epidemiology: a new approach to end-use energy demand research , 2013 .

[3]  David Hsu,et al.  How much information disclosure of building energy performance is necessary , 2014 .

[4]  Shady Attia,et al.  Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools , 2020, Applied Energy.

[5]  Zhiqiang John Zhai,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of the influence of meta-models on Bayesian calibration , 2017 .

[6]  Da Yan,et al.  Building categorization revisited: A clustering-based approach to using smart meter data for building energy benchmarking , 2020 .

[7]  Andrea Gasparella,et al.  From energy signature to cluster analysis: comparison between different clustering algorithms , 2018 .

[8]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation , 2013 .

[9]  Iris M.H. Yeung,et al.  Benchmarking by convex non-parametric least squares with application on the energy performance of office buildings , 2017 .

[10]  Tae-woo Kim,et al.  The study on the Energy Consumption of middle school facilities in Daegu, Korea , 2019, Energy Reports.

[11]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Urban building energy modeling – A review of a nascent field , 2015 .

[12]  Ashwin Sabapathy,et al.  Energy efficiency benchmarks and the performance of LEED rated buildings for Information Technology facilities in Bangalore, India , 2010 .

[13]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Mapping the energy usage in Brazilian public schools , 2020 .

[14]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Method for obtaining reference buildings , 2016 .

[15]  Mohamed M. Ouf,et al.  Energy consumption analysis of school buildings in Manitoba, Canada , 2017 .

[16]  Ilaria Ballarini,et al.  Refurbishment trends of the residential building stock: analysis of a regional pilot case in Italy , 2016 .

[17]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  Building Performance Analysis , 2018 .

[18]  Ilaria Ballarini,et al.  A New Methodology for Assessing the Energy Consumption of Building Stocks , 2017 .

[19]  K. Poolla,et al.  EnergyStar++: Towards more accurate and explanatory building energy benchmarking , 2019, Applied Energy.

[20]  James Pittam,et al.  Stock Aggregation Model and Virtual Archetype for Large Scale Retro-fit Modelling of Local Authority Housing in Ireland☆ , 2014 .

[21]  William Chung,et al.  Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies , 2011 .

[22]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  Developing energy consumption benchmarks for buildings: Bank branches in Brazil , 2014 .

[23]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Exploring the limits for increasing energy efficiency in the residential sector of the European Union: Insights from the rebound effect , 2021 .

[24]  Boris Sucic,et al.  Challenges of combining different methods and tools to improve the performance monitoring in buildings: A case study of elementary schools and kindergartens , 2020 .

[25]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Improved benchmarking comparability for energy consumption in schools , 2014 .

[26]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Household archetypes and behavioural patterns in UK domestic energy use , 2018 .

[27]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application , 2013 .

[28]  Manuel Gameiro da Silva,et al.  Energy consumption in schools – A review paper , 2014 .

[29]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Building-stock aggregation through archetype buildings: France, Germany, Spain and the UK , 2014 .

[30]  Wen-Shing Lee,et al.  Benchmarking the energy efficiency of government buildings with data envelopment analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Phil Steadman,et al.  Co-benefits of Energy and Buildings Data: The Case For supporting Data Access to Achieve a Sustainable Built Environment , 2015 .

[32]  J. Wang,et al.  Energy consumption in elementary and high schools in Taiwan , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Original Article/ResearchA comparative study of benchmarking approaches for non-domestic buildings: Part 1 – Top-down approach , 2013 .

[34]  Ana Carolina de Oliveira Veloso,et al.  Energy benchmarking for office building towers in mild temperate climate , 2020 .

[35]  Francesco Pilla,et al.  Recommending a thermal energy benchmark based on CIBSE TM46 for typical college buildings and creating monthly energy models , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[36]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of user behaviour and physical parameters in residential building performance simulation , 2014 .

[37]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Validation of a Bayesian-based method for defining residential archetypes in urban building energy models , 2017 .

[38]  Bing Liu,et al.  U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the National Building Stock , 2011 .

[39]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of the computer model in building performance simulation , 2014 .

[40]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Building-level and stock-level in contrast: A literature review of the energy performance of buildings during the operational stage , 2020 .