Modeling the vulnerability of complex territorial systems: An application to hydrological risk

Abstract One of the goals of urban planners is to define and to evaluate strategies to mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Adequate methodologies and models should be studied to support their decisions. In this work, an approach to evaluate the overall “systemic” vulnerability of a territory to extreme natural phenomena is presented. This approach is able to support decision makers in evaluating the key preventive planning actions to be exploited on a territory, taking into account both the specific possible damage that is likely to impact the different single relevant elements and the reduction in functionality of the overall territorial system caused by damage to a specific element. To achieve this goal, a graph-based approach is introduced to model the influences that each element may have on the functionality of the overall territorial system. The nodes of the graph represent all the relevant elements in the territory, whose failure or breakdown can seriously influence the functionality of the whole territorial system. The links represent the influences among the functionalities of these elements. An iterative algorithm to compute the consequent systemic vulnerability is also described. In the conclusive section, a case study pertaining to the hydrological risk in the Valle Roja Area located near the North-West coast of Italy is presented.

[1]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  The AVI project: A bibliographical and archive inventory of landslides and floods in Italy , 1994 .

[2]  Ross D. Shachter Probabilistic Inference and Influence Diagrams , 1988, Oper. Res..

[3]  Itsuo Hatono,et al.  Modeling and analysis of decision making problem for mitigating natural disaster risks , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  Valuation-Based Systems for Bayesian Decision Analysis , 1992, Oper. Res..

[5]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  Designing and building real environmental decision support systems , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Lazaros S. Iliadis,et al.  A decision support system applying an integrated fuzzy model for long-term forest fire risk estimation , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  John V. Farr,et al.  Infrastructure Risk Analysis Model , 2000 .

[8]  Analysis of seismic vulnerability using remote sensing and GIS techniques , 2003 .

[9]  Tahir Husain,et al.  A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , 1989 .

[11]  Andrea Emilio Rizzoli,et al.  Delivering environmental decision support systems: Software tools and techniques , 1997 .

[12]  Sakari Kuikka,et al.  Learning Bayesian decision analysis by doing: lessons from environmental and natural resources management , 1999 .

[13]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[14]  N. T. Kottegoda,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[15]  Ralf Denzer,et al.  Generic integration of environmental decision support systems - state-of-the-art , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Statistics, Probability and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[17]  Olli Varis,et al.  Bayesian decision analysis for environmental and resource management , 1997 .

[18]  Y. Haimes,et al.  Leontief-Based Model of Risk in Complex Interconnected Infrastructures , 2001 .

[19]  P. Schoemaker Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis , 1980 .

[20]  A. Zerger Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Wassily Leontief,et al.  Structure of the World Economy: Outline of a Simple Input-Output Formulation , 1974 .