Tittel: Can the Clean Development Mechanism attain both cost-effectiveness and sustainable development objectives? Title: Can the Clean Development Mechanism attain both cost-effectiveness and sustainable development objectives?

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), as defined in the Kyoto Protocol, has two objectives: to promote sustainable development in host developing countries, and to improve global cost- effectiveness by assisting developed countries in meeting their Kyoto targets. The aim of this paper is to explore the background of the CDM and discuss to what extent its current design allows it to achieve its dual objective. The first part of the paper is a literature review that includes descriptions of the flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, the CDM's market potential, and the issues of cost- effectiveness and sustainable development. In the second part of the paper, we discuss to what extent there is a conflict between cost-effectiveness and sustainability, and whether the two objectives of the CDM can be achieved simultaneously. We develop a set of indicators to evaluate non-carbon benefits of CDM projects on the environment, development, and equity, and show how these indicators can be used in practice by looking at case studies of CDM project candidates in the energy sector from Brazil and China. We demonstrate that for some CDM projects there is a trade-off between cost-effectiveness, in terms of a low quota price, and a high score on sustainability indicators. We have reason to believe that the size of the CDM market in some studies is over-estimated since transaction costs and the challenge of promoting sustainable development are not fully accounted for. Also, we find that the proposed set of indicators can be a necessary tool to assure that sustainability impacts of CDM projects are taken into consideration.

[1]  Jinghua Fang,et al.  Coal utilization in industrial boilers in China --a prospect for mitigating CO2 emissions , 1999 .

[2]  Table of Contents , 2016 .

[3]  AN INITIAL VIEW ON METHODOLOGIES FOR EMISSION BASELINES: ELECTRICITY GENERATION CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[4]  Stephen Meyers,et al.  Additionality of emissions reductions from clean development mechanism projects: issues and options for project-level assessments , 1999 .

[5]  Ronald D. Sands,et al.  UNFINISHED BUSINESS: The Economics of The Kyoto Protocol , 2000 .

[6]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: Comparison of project-level costs and benefits , 1995 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Oye,et al.  Coal utilization in industrial boilers in China , 1999 .

[8]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Analysis of post-Kyoto CO₂ emissions trading using marginal abatement curves , 1998 .

[9]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto protocol , 1999 .

[10]  Liu Jingru,et al.  Options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese industrial sector , 1998 .

[11]  서정헌,et al.  반도체 공정 overview , 2001 .

[12]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  Climate policy and development: flexible instruments and developing countries , 2000 .

[13]  Ted Hanisch Joint implementation of commitments to curb climate change , 1991 .

[14]  Richard A. Kerr,et al.  Acid Rain Control: Success on the Cheap , 1998, Science.

[15]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms , 1999 .

[16]  R. Pieters,et al.  Working Paper , 1994 .

[17]  Michael Toman Establishing and Operating the Clean Development Mechanism , 2000 .

[18]  C. N. Ehler,et al.  Monitoring environmental quality , 1986 .

[19]  Knut H. Alfsen,et al.  Coordination of flexible instruments in climate policy , 1998 .

[20]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[21]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Land use & global climate change : forests, land management and the Kyoto Protocol , 2000 .

[22]  Li Junfeng,et al.  How much sustainable development can we expect from the clean development mechanism , 1999 .

[23]  Elena Petkova,et al.  HOW WILL THE CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM ENSURE TRANSPARENCY, PUBLIC E NGAGEMENT, AND ACCOUNTABILITY? , 2000 .