Executive Behavior and Decision Making in Small U.S. Cities

This study examines how chief executives in small U.S. cities allocate their time, view their involvement in decisions related to the dimensions of the governmental process, who they consult in making decisions about local services, and the extent to which they perceive that their decisions are influenced by community interest groups. The study confirms that several differences exist among the different types of executives with respect to time allocation and role emphases. City managers spent more time on and perceived themselves to be more extensively involved in decisions related to local mission, policy, administration, and management compared with mayors. Mayors and city managers exhibited different patterns of consultation with key stakeholders inmaking decisions about local services. City managers were more likely than mayors to engage in activities related to the city’s mission and policy, but they tempered that involvement with a more inclusive pattern of consultation.

[1]  Frank J. Goodnow,et al.  Politics and administration , 1900 .

[2]  R. Lineberry,et al.  Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Albert K. Karnig.  "Private-Regarding" Policy, Civil Rights Groups, and the Mediating Impact of Municipal Reforms , 1975 .

[4]  S. Hansen.  Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[5]  C. Bonjean,et al.  Community structure and leadership arrangements: a multidimensional analysis. , 1976, American sociological review.

[6]  W. Dutton,et al.  Municipal Reform and Group Influence , 1978 .

[7]  J. A. Garcia,et al.  Structure, Function, and Policy in American Cities , 1978 .

[8]  Russell W. Getter,et al.  Structural Sources of Unequal Responsiveness to Group Demands in American Cities , 1983 .

[9]  Barbara Ferman.  Governing the Ungovernable City: Political Skill, Leadership, and the Modern Mayor , 1985 .

[10]  James H. Svara.  Dichotomy and Duality: Reconceptualizing the Relationship Between Policy and Administration in Council-Manager Cities , 1985 .

[11]  C. Yadav.  Comparative Urban Research , 1986 .

[12]  R. Feiock,et al.  MUNICIPAL REPRESENTATION, EXECUTIVE POWER, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY ACTIVITY , 1986 .

[13]  Peter J. Steinberger.  Governing the Ungovernable City: Political Skill, Leadership, and the Modern Mayor . By Ferman Barbara. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1985. Pp. xii + 281. $34.50.) , 1986 .

[14]  Thomas P. Lauth,et al.  The politics of state and city administration , 1986 .

[15]  David N. Ammons,et al.  Role Emphases of City Managers and Other Municipal Executives , 1987 .

[16]  L. O'toole.  Doctrines and Developments: Separation of Powers, the Po itics-Adm iinistration Dichotomy, and the Rise of the Administrative State , 1987 .

[17]  B. Rockman,et al.  Mandates or Mandarins? Control and Discretion in the Modern Administrative State , 1988 .

[18]  James H. Svara.  Official Leadership in the City: Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation , 1990 .

[19]  Legitimizing Public Administration: A Disturbed Dissent , 1993 .

[20]  Camilla Stivers.  The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration , 1994 .

[21]  J. Douglas,et al.  A Case for Reinterpreted Dichotomy of Politics and Administration as a Professional Standard in Council-Manager Government , 1995 .

[22]  Allen D. Hertzke.  Sin Boldly: Lowi, Liberalism, and the Love of God , 1995 .

[23]  H. George Frederickson,et al.  The spirit of public administration , 1996 .

[24]  L. Keller,et al.  Political Science and Public Administration: A Necessary Cleft? , 1997 .

[25]  M. L. Whicker,et al.  Political Science and American Public Administration: A Necessary Cleft? , 1997 .

[26]  James H. Svara.  THE POLITICS-ADMINISTRATION DICHOTOMY MODEL AS ABERRATION , 1998 .

[27]  James H. Svara.  The Shifting Boundary between Elected Officials and City Managers in Large Council-Manager Cities , 1999 .

[28]  James H. Svara.  Complementarity of Politics and Administration as a Legitimate Alternative to the Dichotomy Model , 1999 .

[29]  R. Kearney,et al.  Reinventing Government in Reformed Municipalities , 2001 .

[30]  James H. Svara.  The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration , 2001 .

[31]  P. Kokkonen,et al.  [Resources in the future]. , 2001, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[32]  Micheal W. Giles,et al.  Collaborating to Reduce Poverty , 2001 .

[33]  S. Legge,et al.  Politics and Administration in U.S. Local Governments , 2002 .

[34]  James H. Svara,et al.  Leadership At The Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments , 2002 .

[35]  Municipal Reform in Mayor-Council Cities: A Well-Kept Secret , 2003 .

[36]  J. Gilley.  The Manager as Politician , 2005 .