Asymmetric mechanical properties of porcine aortic sinuses.

BACKGROUND Aortic sinuses are crucial components of the aortic root and important for aortic valve function. Mathematical modeling of various aortic valve or root replacements requires tissue material properties, and those of the aortic sinuses are unknown. The aim of this study is to compare the biaxial mechanical properties of the individual porcine aortic sinuses. METHODS Square specimens, oriented in the longitudinal and circumferential directions, were excised from the left coronary, right coronary, and noncoronary porcine sinuses. Tissue thickness was measured, and specimens were subjected to equibiaxial mechanical testing. Stress-strain data corresponding to a 35% stretch were fitted to a Fung strain energy function. Tissue stiffness and anisotropy were compared at 0.3 strain. RESULTS The circumferential direction was more compliant than the longitudinal one for left coronary (183.03 +/- 40.78 kPa versus 231.17 +/- 45.38 kPa, respectively; p = 0.04) and right coronary sinuses (321.74 +/- 129.68 kPa versus 443.49 +/- 143.59 kPa, respectively; p = 0.02) at 30% strain. No such differences were noted for noncoronary sinuses (331.74 +/- 129.68 kPa versus 415.98 +/- 191.38 kPa; p = 0.19). Left coronary sinus was also significantly more compliant than right and noncoronary sinuses. There were no differences between right coronary and noncoronary sinus tissues. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that the material properties of the porcine aortic sinuses are not symmetric. The left coronary sinus is significantly more compliant than the remaining sinuses. Realistic modeling of the aortic root must take into account the asymmetric differences in tissue material properties of the aortic sinuses.

[1]  Karyn S Kunzelman,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of porcine ascending aortic wall tissue. , 2002, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[2]  Y C Fung,et al.  Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  K. J. Grande,et al.  Stress Variations in the Human Aortic Root and Valve: The Role of Anatomic Asymmetry , 1998, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  Fiber-induced material behavior in composites , 1986 .

[5]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Stress sharing between the sinus and leaflets of canine aortic valve. , 1986, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Komarakshi R Balakrishnan,et al.  Further insights into normal aortic valve function: role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  Komarakshi R Balakrishnan,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  K S Kunzelman,et al.  Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite-element modeling of Marfan syndrome. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  K S Kunzelman,et al.  Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite element modeling of aortic root dilatation. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Alun D. Hughes,et al.  Evidence of a Dominant Backward-Propagating “Suction” Wave Responsible for Diastolic Coronary Filling in Humans, Attenuated in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  Karyn S Kunzelman,et al.  A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root. , 2003, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[12]  Namrata Gundiah,et al.  Determination of strain energy function for arterial elastin: Experiments using histology and mechanical tests. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Longitudinal and radial distensibility of the porcine aortic root. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  S. Cowin,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[15]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Mechanics of the arterial wall: review and directions. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[16]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[17]  P J Kilner,et al.  The aortic outflow and root: a tale of dynamism and crosstalk. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Location of the coronary arterial orifices in the normal heart , 1997, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  Y C Fung,et al.  Biaxial mechanics of excised canine pulmonary arteries. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  K S Kunzelman,et al.  Re-creation of sinuses is important for sparing the aortic valve: a finite element study. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Richard P. Cochran,et al.  Finite-element analysis of aortic valve-sparing: influence of graft shape and stiffness , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[23]  Khee Hiang Lim,et al.  Dynamic balance of the aortomitral junction. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  P. Dagum,et al.  Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  Wei Sun,et al.  Multiaxial mechanical behavior of biological materials. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.