The effect of seed orientation deviations on the quality of 125I prostate implants.
暂无分享,去创建一个
J J Jezioranski | J Crook | I. Yeung | J. Crook | J. Corbett | J. Jezioranski | T. Tran | J F Corbett | T Tran | I W Yeung
[1] S. C. Prasad,et al. Dose distribution for 125I implants due to anisotropic radiation emission and unknown seed orientation. , 1987, Medical physics.
[2] J. Battista,et al. The effect of seed anisotrophy on brachytherapy dose distributions using 125I and 103Pd. , 2001, Medical physics.
[3] M Wannenmacher,et al. Seed loss in interstitial radiotherapy of prostatic carcinoma with I-125. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[4] W. Butler,et al. Seed fixity in the prostate/periprostatic region following brachytherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[5] L. Anderson,et al. Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43 , 1995 .
[6] W. Butler,et al. Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. , 2000, Medical physics.
[7] John A. Nelder,et al. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..
[8] L. Anderson,et al. Functional fitting of interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry data recommended by the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 43. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 1999, Medical physics.
[9] S Nag,et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[10] N. Yue,et al. Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: a rigorous solution. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[11] J Pouliot,et al. Monte Carlo simulations of prostate implants to improve dosimetry and compare planning methods. , 1999, Medical physics.
[12] R Nath,et al. Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64. , 1999, Medical physics.
[13] H H Holm,et al. Ultrasound-guided implantation techniques in treatment of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Urologic clinics of North America.
[14] B W Corn,et al. Effect of edema on the post-implant dosimetry of an I-125 prostate implant: a case study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[15] W. Butler,et al. Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.
[16] Julie Dawson,et al. Dose effects of seeds placement deviations from pre-planned positions in ultrasound guided prostate implants , 1994 .
[17] Zhe Chen,et al. Dosimetric effects of needle divergence in prostate seed implant using 125I and 103Pd radioactive seeds. , 2000, Medical physics.
[18] H. Holm,et al. Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography. , 1983, The Journal of urology.
[19] N. Yue,et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition. , 1998, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.