Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model

Abstract The assessment of economic and technical efficiency is a useful tool to select the most appropriate technology for wastewater treatment. However, traditional models require that the units being assessed operate with the same technology. To overcome this limitation, we investigate the viability of using a non-concave metafrontier approach that is based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate the techno-economic efficiency and technological gap ratios (TGRs) of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) operating with non-homogeneous technologies. The model is applied to a sample of 99 Spanish WWTPs, encompassing four alternative technologies: activated sludge; aerated lagoon; trickling filter; and rotating biological contactor. The results indicate that mean efficiencies are relatively high and uniform across the different technologies. Furthermore, analysis of TGR values shows that techno-economic efficiency is optimal for WWTPs operating with activated sludge in comparison with the other technologies. Our study shows the importance of quantitatively comparing the efficiency of WWTPs that use different technologies in order to help managers make informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate technology.

[1]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Hotel efficiency: A bootstrapped metafrontier approach , 2010 .

[2]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[3]  H. Schmiedel,et al.  Is There a Single Frontier in a Single European Banking Market? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Albert Assaf,et al.  Accounting for size in efficiency comparisons of airports , 2009 .

[5]  M. Zibaei,et al.  The effects of veterinary services on technical efficiency of dairy farms in Iran: a DEA approach , 2008 .

[6]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[8]  Euan Fleming,et al.  Technical efficiency and environmental-technological gaps in wheat production in Kerman province of Iran , 2007 .

[9]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  Are small firms less efficient? , 2009 .

[10]  Huang Xia,et al.  Removal efficiencies of organic micropollutants in wastewater-based reclaimed water by two different treatment processes. , 2009 .

[11]  Yujiro Hayami,et al.  Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap Among Selected Countries , 1969 .

[12]  K. Matawie,et al.  A bootstrapped metafrontier model , 2010 .

[13]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[14]  Christopher J. O'Donnell,et al.  Metafrontier Functions for the Study of Inter-regional Productivity Differences , 2003 .

[15]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[16]  C. Hsiao,et al.  Performance measurement in wastewater control - pig farms in Taiwan. , 2007 .

[17]  Sixto Malato,et al.  Integration of Environmental and Economic Performance of Processes. Case Study on Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment , 2008 .

[18]  E Choi,et al.  Economical and technical efficiencies evaluation of full scale piggery wastewater treatment BNR plants. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  George E. Battese,et al.  Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function , 2002 .

[20]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Pierre Lucien Cote,et al.  Comparison of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation , 2004 .

[22]  K. Tsekouras,et al.  Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach , 2010 .

[23]  N. Suñé,et al.  Removal efficiency of a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment according to vegetation dominance. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[24]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Boris E. Bravo-Ureta,et al.  Technical efficiency and metatechnology ratios for dairy farms in three southern cone countries: a stochastic meta-frontier model , 2010 .

[26]  Paul N. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Technology , 1994 .

[27]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Mechanism and design of intermittent aeration activated sludge process for nitrogen removal , 2011, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[28]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Efficiency and technology gap in China's agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis , 2008 .

[29]  Supawat Rungsuriyawiboon,et al.  Agricultural efficiency, technical change and productivity in China , 2010 .

[30]  Juan A. Baeza,et al.  Effect of internal recycle on the nitrogen removal efficiency of an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) , 2004 .

[31]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic Feasibility Study for Phosphorus Recovery Processes , 2011, AMBIO.

[32]  Vicente Liern,et al.  Increasing offensive or defensive efficiency? An analysis of Italian and Spanish football , 2009 .

[33]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Probabilistic modelling and evaluation of wastewater treatment plant upgrades in a water quality based evaluation context. , 2010 .

[34]  Andrew A Randall,et al.  The efficiency of enhanced biological phosphorus removal from real wastewater affected by different ratios of acetic to propionic acid. , 2004, Water research.

[35]  Tammo Francksen,et al.  Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach , 2011, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  K Brindle,et al.  The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[37]  Y. Huang,et al.  Measurement of technology heterogeneity by metafronter , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings.

[38]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach , 2009 .

[39]  Thomas Wintgens,et al.  Methodologies for feasibility studies related to wastewater reclamation and reuse projects , 2006 .

[40]  Thomas D. Waite,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology , 2005 .