Lack of inactivation of a mouse X-linked gene physically separated from the inactivation centre.

Previous evidence had shown that, when a mammalian X-chromosome is broken by a translocation, only one of the two X-chromosome segments shows cytological signs of X-inactivation in the form of late replication or Kanda staining. In the two mouse X-autosome translocations T(X;4)37H and T(X;11)38H the X-chromosome break is in the A1-A2 bands; in both, the shorter translocation product fails to exhibit Kanda staining. By in situ hybridization, the locus of ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OCT) was shown to be proximal to the breakpoint (i.e. on the short product) in T37H and distal to the breakpoint in T38H. Histochemical staining for OCT showed that in T38H the locus of OCT undergoes random inactivation, as in a chromosomally normal animal, whereas in T37H the OCT locus remains active in all cells. The interpretation is that, when a segment of X-chromosome is physically separated from the X-inactivation centre, it fails to undergo inactivation. This point is important for the understanding of the mechanism of X-inactivation, since it implies that inactivation is a positive process, brought about by some event that travels along the chromosome. It is also relevant to the interpretation of the harmful effects of X-autosome translocations and the abnormalities seen in individuals carrying such translocations.

[1]  K. Wareham,et al.  Estimation of the primordial pool size of the mouse liver using a histochemically demonstrable X-linked enzyme in the adult female mouse. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[2]  S. Rastan,et al.  X-chromosome deletions in embryo-derived (EK) cell lines associated with lack of X-chromosome inactivation. , 1985, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[3]  I. Craig,et al.  Homologous expressed genes in the human sex chromosome pairing region , 1985, Nature.

[4]  S. Rastan.  Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mouse X-autosome translocation embryos--location of the inactivation centre. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[5]  T. Shows,et al.  High-resolution chromosomal localization of human genes for amylase, proopiomelanocortin, somatostatin, and a DNA fragment (D3S1) by in situ hybridization. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  E. P. Evans,et al.  Two new X-autosome translocations in the mouse. , 1983, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[7]  B. Cattanach,et al.  Controlling elements in the mouse. IV. Evidence of non-random X-inactivation. , 1981, Genetical research.

[8]  P. V. van Buul,et al.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity and karyotype in mice using cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes, and comparison with this system in man. , 1977, Mutation research.

[9]  R. Demars,et al.  Abnormal ornithine carbamoyltransferase in mice having the sparse-fur mutation. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  B. Cattanach.  Control of chromosome inactivation. , 1975, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  B. Cattanach.  Position effect variegation in the mouse. , 1974, Genetical research.

[12]  L. B. Russell,et al.  Comparative studies on X-autosome translocations in the mouse. II. Inactivation of autosomal loci, segregation, and mapping of autosomal breakpoints in five T (X;1) S. , 1970, Genetics.

[13]  L. B. Russell.  Mammalian X-Chromosome Action: Inactivation Limited in Spread and in Region of Origin , 1963, Science.

[14]  L. B. Russell.  Genetics of Mammalian Sex Chromosomes , 1961, Science.