Evaluation on the Impact of Image Quality on Image Retrieval

In recent years, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) using local invariant features has been a hot research topic. In CBIR, the retrieval performance, such as accuracy and efficiency, is significantly affected by the quality of the query image. Generally, the image quality is determined by many factors, such as image resolution, noise addition, rotation, JPEG compression, selected local features, etc. In this paper, we make a comprehensive study on those factors to investigate their impact on image search accuracy. We build the baseline system with the classic Bag-of-Visual-Words model and the inverted index structure. Two public released datasets, i.e., UKBench and Oxford Building, are selected as ground truth dataset. Based on the extensive experimental study, some conclusions are drawn from the evaluation results. In UKBench dataset, performance keeps stable if the image size is controlled in a certain range of 384×288 to 576×432. Also, the JPEG conpreession ratio can be reduced to as low as 8% of base one but has little impact on retrieval performance. What is more, Image performance achieves 90% of best result though its PSNR value is 32 when we test in Oxford Building dataset.

[1]  Qi Tian,et al.  Spatial coding for large scale partial-duplicate web image search , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[2]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  Meng Wang,et al.  Movie2Comics: Towards a Lively Video Content Presentation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[4]  David Nistér,et al.  Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[5]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[6]  Michael Isard,et al.  Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Image retrieval with geometry-preserving visual phrases , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[8]  Meng Wang,et al.  Movie2Comics: a feast of multimedia artwork , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[9]  Qi Tian,et al.  Scalar quantization for large scale image search , 2012, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Xiaoyan Sun,et al.  IMShare: instantly sharing your mobile landmark images by search-based reconstruction , 2012, ACM Multimedia.

[11]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  QsRank: Query-sensitive hash code ranking for efficient ∊-neighbor search , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Bin Wang,et al.  Large-Scale Duplicate Detection for Web Image Search , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[13]  Shiliang Zhang,et al.  Edge-SIFT: Discriminative Binary Descriptor for Scalable Partial-Duplicate Mobile Search , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[15]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..