Automatic Subcortical Structure Segmentation Using Probabilistic Atlas

Automatic segmentation of sub-cortical structures has great use in studying various neurodegentative diseases. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic solution to this problem through the utilization of a distribution atlas built from a set of training MR images. Our model consists of two major components: a local likelihood based active contour (LLAC) model and a guiding probabilistic atlas. The former has a very strong ability in standing out the structures that are in low contrast with the surrounding tissues. The latter has the functionality of defining and leading the segmentation procedure to capture the structure of interest. Formulated under the maximum a posterior framework, probabilistic atlas for the structure of interest, e.g. caudate, putamen, can be seamlessly integrated into the level set evolution procedure, and no thresholding step is needed for capturing the target.

[1]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  Juan Zhou,et al.  Segmentation of subcortical brain structures using fuzzy templates , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  Martin Styner,et al.  Subcortical structure segmentation using probabilistic atlas priors , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[5]  L. Vese,et al.  A level set algorithm for minimizing the Mumford-Shah functional in image processing , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision.

[6]  R. Deriche,et al.  A variational framework for active and adaptative segmentation of vector valued images , 2002, Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, 2002. Proceedings..

[7]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Coupled Geodesic Active Regions for Image Segmentation: A Level Set Approach , 2000, ECCV.

[8]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Segmentation of 3D deformable objects with level set based prior models , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: Methods and applications , 2005 .

[10]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-based stereotactic atlas from 250 young normal subjects , 1992 .

[12]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  A Review of Statistical Approaches to Level Set Segmentation: Integrating Color, Texture, Motion and Shape , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Jundong Liu,et al.  Distribution-based Level Set Segmentation for Brain MR Images , 2007, BMVC.

[14]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Non-linear Bayesian Image Modelling , 2000, ECCV.

[16]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Anatomical guided segmentation with non-stationary tissue class distributions in an expectation-maximization framework , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[17]  Anthony J. Yezzi,et al.  A curve evolution approach to smoothing and segmentation using the Mumford-Shah functional , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.