On the behavioral effects of residential electricity submetering in a heating season

Abstract In general, occupants' only visible connection to their energy consumption is the bimonthly or monthly statements that summarize the cost of their energy use. However, a quarter of Canadian households do not directly pay for their energy bills. Instead, the landlord, property manager, or the condominium corporation are responsible for energy bills. As such, there is no monetary incentive for tenants to make energy-saving retrofits or modify their behaviors to save energy. In this study, a questionnaire survey was carried out with 20 participants who were responsible for their energy bills and 20 participants who were not responsible for their energy bills. Temperature loggers were placed in the living rooms and bedrooms of these participants' apartments during two consecutive heating seasons in Ottawa, Ontario. Results showed that occupants who were responsible for their energy bills were more diligent and active in controlling indoor air temperature. These occupants chose to heat different areas of their units at different times. On the contrary, the occupants, who were not responsible for their energy bills, rarely adjusted their thermostat settings or setback their thermostats. Furthermore, the occupants who were not responsible for their energy bills maintained their apartments about 2 °C higher than their counterparts who were responsible for their energy bills.

[1]  K. Parsons The effects of gender, acclimation state, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort , 2002 .

[2]  J. Darley,et al.  Predicting Summer Energy Consumption from Homeowners' Attitudes1 , 1979 .

[3]  Chi Kwan Chau,et al.  A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes , 2010 .

[4]  Ian Beausoleil-Morrison,et al.  A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices , 2013 .

[5]  Therese Peffer,et al.  How people use thermostats in homes: A review , 2011, Building and Environment.

[6]  Bryan Urban,et al.  A CASE FOR THERMOSTAT USER MODELS , 2013 .

[7]  Lucie Maruejols,et al.  Split incentives and energy efficiency in Canadian multi-family dwellings , 2011 .

[8]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users , 2010 .

[9]  A. Levinson,et al.  Energy Use By Apartment Tenants When Landlords Pay For Utilities , 2004 .

[10]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[11]  S. Karjalainen Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments , 2007 .

[12]  Gwendolyn Brandon,et al.  REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY , 1999 .

[13]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Relating Attitudes to Residential Energy Use , 1981 .

[14]  Darren Robinson,et al.  On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants , 2008 .

[15]  Trevor Tombe,et al.  The Impact of Sub-Metering on Condominium Electricity Demand , 2011 .

[16]  Myoung-Souk Yeo,et al.  Characteristics of pressure distribution and solution to the problems caused by stack effect in high-rise residential buildings , 2007 .

[17]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  Thermal comfort and use of thermostats in Finnish homes and offices , 2009 .