Analysis of recurrence probability following radiotherapy in patients with CNS WHO grade 2 meningioma using integrated molecular-morphologic classification

Abstract Background The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumors distinguishes 3 malignancy grades in meningiomas, with increasing risk of recurrence from CNS WHO grades 1 to 3. Radiotherapy is recommended by current EANO guidelines for patients not safely amenable to surgery or after incomplete resection in higher grades. Despite adequately predicting recurrence probability for the majority of CNS WHO grade 2 meningioma patients, a considerable subset of patients demonstrates an unexpectedly early tumor recurrence following radiotherapy. Methods A retrospective cohort of 44 patients with CNS WHO grade 2 meningiomas were stratified into 3 risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) using an integrated morphological, CNV- and methylation family-based classification. Local progression-free survival (lPFS) following radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed and total dose of radiation was correlated with survival outcome. Radiotherapy treatment plans were correlated with follow-up images to characterize the pattern of relapse. Treatment toxicities were further assessed. Results Risk stratification of CNS WHO grade 2 meningioma into integrated risk groups demonstrated a significant difference in 3-year lPFS following radiotherapy between the molecular low- and high-risk groups. Recurrence pattern analysis revealed that 87.5 % of initial relapses occurred within the RT planning target volume or resection cavity. Conclusions Integrated risk scoring can identify CNS WHO grade 2 meningioma patients at risk or relapse and dissemination following radiotherapy. Therapeutic management of CNS WHO grade 2 meningiomas and future clinical trials should be adjusted according to the molecular risk-groups, and not rely on conventional CNS WHO grading alone.

[1]  K. Herfarth,et al.  Radiation-induced contrast enhancement following proton radiotherapy for low-grade glioma depends on tumor characteristics and is rarer in children than adults. , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  David C. Jones,et al.  Integrated Molecular-Morphologic Meningioma Classification: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis, Retrospectively and Prospectively Validated , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Weller,et al.  EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. , 2021, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  Versione,et al.  Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events , 2020, Definitions.

[5]  P. Wen,et al.  Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice , 2019, CNS oncology.

[6]  L. Collette,et al.  Adjuvant postoperative high-dose radiotherapy for atypical and malignant meningioma: A phase-II parallel non-randomized and observation study (EORTC 22042-26042). , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Till Acker,et al.  DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours , 2018, Nature.

[8]  M. Tate,et al.  Gross total resection and adjuvant radiotherapy most significant predictors of improved survival in patients with atypical meningioma , 2018, Cancer.

[9]  Martin Sill,et al.  DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  M. Mehta,et al.  High-risk meningioma: Initial outcomes from NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  A. Nanda,et al.  Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comparison of Extent of Frontal Lobe Changes After Lateral and Bifrontal Approaches. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[12]  Y. Shoshan,et al.  Review of controversies in management of non-benign meningioma , 2016, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Weller,et al.  EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  J. Schramm,et al.  The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  D. Brachman,et al.  Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays , 2014, Bioinform..

[17]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. von Deimling,et al.  Carbon ion radiation therapy for high-risk meningiomas. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  R. Ojemann,et al.  Management of Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas: Role of High-dose, 3D-conformal Radiation Therapy , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[20]  W. Simpson,et al.  Radiotherapy for atypical or malignant intracranial meningioma. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  M. Khan,et al.  The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.