Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors

The usability of electronic health records (EHRs) continues to be a point of dissatisfaction for providers, despite certification requirements from the Office of the National Coordinator that require EHR vendors to employ a user-centered design (UCD) process. To better understand factors that contribute to poor usability, a research team visited 11 different EHR vendors in order to analyze their UCD processes and discover the specific challenges that vendors faced as they sought to integrate UCD with their EHR development. Our analysis demonstrates a diverse range of vendors' UCD practices that fall into 3 categories: well-developed UCD, basic UCD, and misconceptions of UCD. Specific challenges to practicing UCD include conducting contextually rich studies of clinical workflow, recruiting participants for usability studies, and having support from leadership within the vendor organization. The results of the study provide novel insights for how to improve usability practices of EHR vendors.

[1]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction , 2013 .

[2]  Sue E Bowman.  Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. , 2013, Perspectives in health information management.

[3]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  S. Davidson,et al.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. , 2004, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  Erin Sparnon,et al.  The Role of the Electronic Health Record in Patient Safety Events , 2012 .

[6]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Research Article: An Interface-driven Analysis of User Interactions with an Electronic Health Records System , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Charlotte A. Weaver,et al.  Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[8]  尚弘 島影.  National Institute of Standards and Technologyにおける超伝導研究及び生活 , 2001 .

[9]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medicine.

[11]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Information Tasks: Toward a User-Centered Approach to Information Systems , 1996 .

[12]  Alissa L. Russ,et al.  Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[13]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  L. Kux.  OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration , 2014 .

[15]  Carl Eklund,et al.  National Institute for Standards and Technology , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[16]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Defining Health Information Technology-Related Errors , 2017 .

[17]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. , 2013, Health affairs.

[18]  Mark W Friedberg,et al.  Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy. , 2013, Rand health quarterly.

[19]  Kai Zheng,et al.  An Interface-Driven Analysis of User Behavior of an Electronic Health Records System , 2009 .