AGRONOMY & SOILS Response of Obsolete and Modern Cotton Genotypes to Varying Plant Densities

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) producers are interested in reduced seeding rates due to increasing seed costs. It is not clear whether diverse cotton genotypes respond differently to reduced plant densities. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the performance of obsolete and modern cotton genotypes grown under reduced and traditional plant population densities. The six genotypes representing five decades of release were grown at either five plants m -2 (low) or 10 plants m -2 (high) densities, during the years 2009 through 2012. Dry-matter partitioning, growth analysis, yield, yield component, and fiber quality data were collected. Genotypes did not interact with plant densities for any trait. Despite few consistent dry-matter partitioning or growth differences among the genotypes, large genotypic differences were detected in lint yield and fiber quality production. The obsolete genotypes had lower yields because of reduced lint percentage and lint index. The higher yielding genotypes produced more bolls per unit area to generate their higher yields. Increased light interception by the high density treatment was offset by the ability of the leaves of the low density canopy to more efficiently intercept and utilize sunlight. These counteracting traits resulted in no yield or fiber quality differences between the two densities. Yield success can be achieved with a reduced seeding rate if uniform seedling spacing is also achieved, possibly regardless of the cultivar planted.

[1]  R. Brown,et al.  Growth of the Green Plant , 2015 .

[2]  G. Hammer,et al.  Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: Canopy development and radiation use efficiency , 2013 .

[3]  W. Pettigrew MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY Genotypic Variation in Physiological Strategies For Attaining Cotton Lint Yield Production , 2012 .

[4]  W. Meredith,et al.  Registration of MD 9ne and MD 25 High‐Fiber‐Quality Germplasm Lines of Cotton , 2011 .

[5]  W. S. Anthony,et al.  Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton Produced at Varying Plant Densities , 2005, Agronomy Journal.

[6]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  AGRONOMY AND SOILS Effects of Different Seeding Rates and Plant Growth Regulators on Early-planted Cotton , 2005 .

[7]  V. Sadras,et al.  Growth analysis of cotton crops infested with spider mites. II. Partitioning of dry matter , 1997 .

[8]  James J. Heitholt,et al.  Canopy Characteristics Associated with Deficient and Excessive Cotton Plant Population Densities , 1994 .

[9]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  Leaf Gas Exchange Parameters Vary among Cotton Genotypes , 1994 .

[10]  Z. Sawan,et al.  Effect of plant population densities and application of growth retardants on cottonseed yield and quality , 1993 .

[11]  T. A. Kerby,et al.  Genotypes and Plant Densities for Narrow‐Row Cotton Systems. I. Height, Nodes, Earliness, and Location of Yield , 1990 .

[12]  T. A. Kerby,et al.  Genotypes and Plant Densities for Narrow-Row Cotton Systems. II. Leaf Area and Dry-Matter Partitioning , 1990 .

[13]  G. Constable Growth and light receipt by mainstem cotton leaves in relation to plant density in the field , 1986 .

[14]  R. Wells,et al.  Comparative Growth of Obsolete and Modern Cotton Cultivars. III. Relationship of Yield to Observed Growth Characteristics 1 , 1984 .

[15]  J. M. Poehlman,et al.  Cotton Cultivar Response to Plant Populations in a Short‐Season, Narrow‐Row Cultural System1 , 1982 .

[16]  H. H. Ramey,et al.  Plant Spacings with Irrigated Cotton 1 , 1979 .

[17]  R. E. Briggs,et al.  Canopy Characteristics of Narrow‐Row Cotton as Influenced by Plant Density1 , 1977 .