Investigation of the Coal Gasification Process Under Various Operating Conditions Inside a Two-Stage Entrained Flow Gasifier

Numerical simulations of the coal gasification process inside a generic 2-stage entrained-flow gasifier fed with Indonesian coal at approximately 2000 metric tone/day are carried out. The 3-D Navier-Stokes equations and eight species transport equations are solved with three heterogeneous global reactions, three homogeneous reactions, and two-step thermal cracking equation of volatiles. The Chemical Percolation Devolatilization (CPD) model is used for the devolatilization process. Finite rates are used for the heterogeneous solid-to-gas reactions. Both finite rate and eddy-breakup combustion models are calculated for each homogeneous gas-to-gas reaction, and the smaller of the two rates is used. The water-shift reaction rate is adjusted to match available syngas composition from existing operational data without catalyst. This study is conducted to investigate the effects of different operation parameters on the gasification process including coal mixture (dry vs. slurry), oxidant (oxygen-blown vs. air-blown), and different coal distribution between two stages. In the two-stage coal-slurry feed operation, the dominant reactions are intense char combustion in the first stage and enhanced gasification reactions in the second stage. The gas temperature in the first stage for the dry-fed case is about 800 K higher than the slurry-fed case. This calls for attention of additional refractory maintenance in the dry-fed case. One-stage operation yields higher H2, CO and CH4 combined than if a two-stage operation is used, but with a lower syngas heating value. High heating value (HHV) of syngas for the one-stage operation is 7.68 MJ/kg, compared to 8.24 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 72%-25% fuel distribution and 9.03 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 50%-50% fuel distribution. Carbon conversion efficiency of the air-blown case is 77.3%, which is much lower than that of the oxygen-blown case (99.4%). The syngas heating value for the air-blown case is 4.40 MJ/kg, which is almost half of the heating value of the oxygen-blown case (8.24 MJ/kg).

[1]  K. Kuo Principles of combustion , 1986 .

[2]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[3]  A. Silaen,et al.  Top Fuel Injection Design in an Entrained-Flow Coal Gasifier Guided by Numerical Simulations , 2011 .

[4]  S. E. Zitney,et al.  Gasification CFD Modeling for Advanced Power Plant Simulations , 2005 .

[5]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Chemical model of coal devolatilization using percolation lattice statistics , 1989 .

[6]  T. Fletcher,et al.  Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 2. Temperature and heating rate effects on product yields , 1990 .

[7]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames , 1981 .

[8]  Adel F. Sarofim,et al.  CFD Modeling For Entrained Flow Gasifiers , 2002 .

[9]  L. Douglas Smoot,et al.  Coal Combustion and Gasification , 1985 .

[10]  John Kent,et al.  A computational study of heterogeneous char reactions in a full-scale furnace , 1994 .

[11]  W. P. Jones,et al.  Global reaction schemes for hydrocarbon combustion , 1988 .

[12]  Hiroaki Watanabe,et al.  Numerical simulation of coal gasification in entrained flow coal gasifier , 2006 .

[13]  W. E. Ranz,et al.  Evaporation from drops , 1952 .

[14]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer , 2020 .

[15]  Ting Wang,et al.  COMPARISON OF INSTANTANEOUS, EQUILIBRIUM, AND FINITE-RATE GASIFICATION MODELS IN AN ENTRAINED-FLOW COAL GASIFIER , 2009 .

[16]  A. Silaen,et al.  Effect of turbulence and devolatilization models on coal gasification simulation in an entrained-flow gasifier , 2010 .

[17]  A. Sarofim,et al.  Coal devolatilization at high temperatures , 1977 .

[18]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 3. Direct use of carbon-13 NMR data to predict effects of coal type , 1992 .

[19]  Ting Wang,et al.  Effects of Fuel Injection Angles on Performance of A Two-Stage Coal Gasifier , 2006 .

[20]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers. Part II: effects of operating conditions on gasifier performance , 2000 .

[21]  Xijia Lu,et al.  Water-Gas Shift Modeling of Coal Gasification in an Entrained-Flow Gasifier , 2011 .

[22]  P. J Benyon,et al.  Computational Modelling of Entrained Flow Slagging Gasifiers , 2002 .

[23]  A. Silaen,et al.  Investigation of Heat Transfer and Gasification of Two Different Fuel Injectors in an Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier , 2010 .

[24]  Ting Wang,et al.  Effects of Turbulence and Devolatilization Models on Gasification Simulation , 2008 .