Varieties of Spatial Cognition

Spatial cognition is not one, but many things. The variety of spatial goals an organism must attain is apparently matched by a variety of neural systems. These systems, and some aspects of their emergence during development, are the concerns of this chapter. Modern systems neuroscience generally holds to the view that the brain is organized into a set of “modules,” each of which is concerned with processing and probably storing information of a certain kind, for example, spatial, verbal, and temporal, (cf. Nadel & Wexler, 1985). By extension, neural systems concerned with “space” could be viewed in terms of the kind of spatial information they represent and process. In general, we would expect neural representational systems to be organized around the kinds of information animals need to function in the world. Spatial systems might then be expected to focus on the kinds of information demanded by the organism’s spatial functions. And what might those functions be? First, and perhaps most primitively, animals organize their movements with respect to the frame of reference provided by their own bodies. As all coordinated action demands such organization, we can assume that any complex animal must be able to internally represent, process, and transform information about the position and movement of its own body and movable parts. Primates, for example, represent information with respect to a number of body “coordinates,” including their eyes, head, and torso, each of which can move independently of the other. Such movements change the location of other body parts and the apparent position of everything external to the animal, in the absence of any movement of these external stimuli. In order to compensate for these apparent changes in location, animals must be able to represent their own movements in space so as to determine when such changes are the result of their own movements and when not. Second, animals act with respect to objects and events, including other animals, in the external world. Hence, they need to be able to represent such aspects of the world. This includes the need to represent the spatial attributes of objects/events as well as the location of these entities in the large-scale environment within which both they and the organism coexist. Finally, these objects and events transpire in certain places at certain times, and advanced animals likely require representational systems

[1]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Neonatal frontal lesions in hamsters impair species-typical behaviors and reduce brain weight and neocortical thickness. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  Joseph Altman,et al.  Directions in neurogenetic gradients and patterns of anatomical connections in the telencephalon , 1987, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[4]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  Maturation of the adrenocortical stress response: Neuroendocrine control mechanisms and the stress hyporesponsive period , 1986, Brain Research Reviews.

[5]  H. Pick,et al.  Environmental differentiation and familiarity as determinants of children's memory for spatial location. , 1975 .

[6]  D. Benson,et al.  Loss of topographic familiarity. An environmental agnosia. , 1986, Archives of neurology.

[7]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Infantile Amnesia: A Neurobiological Perspective , 1984 .

[8]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  Early postnatal handling alters glucocorticoid receptor concentrations in selected brain regions. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  B. McEwen,et al.  Corticosterone decreases 3H-glutamate binding in rat hippocampal formation. , 1988, Neuroendocrinology.

[10]  I. Whishaw Cholinergic receptor blockade in the rat impairs locale but not taxon strategies for place navigation in a swimming pool. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  M. Diamond,et al.  Morphologic hippocampal asymmetry in male and female rats , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  J. Juraska,et al.  Behavioral interactions of postweaning male and female rats with a complex environment. , 1986, Developmental psychobiology.

[13]  J. Juraska Sex differences in developmental plasticity in the visual cortex and hippocampal dentate gyrus. , 1984, Progress in brain research.

[14]  M. Mishkin,et al.  An early and a late developing system for learning and retention in infant monkeys. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  B. Milner The memory defect in bilateral hippocampal lesions. , 1959, Psychiatric research reports.

[16]  K. Harris,et al.  Developmental onset of long‐term potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  L. Means,et al.  Effects of hippocampal lesions on cue utilization in spatial discrimination in rats. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[18]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Spatial memory deficit in senescent rats. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  M. J. Renner Experience-dependent changes in exploratory behavior in the adult rat (Rattus norvegicus): overall activity level and interactions with objects , 1987 .

[20]  E K Warrington,et al.  Selective impairment of topographical memory: a single case study. , 1978 .

[21]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[22]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[23]  I. Krechevsky,et al.  "Hypotheses" in rats. , 1932 .

[24]  F. Restle Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question. , 1957, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Miller,et al.  Evidence for caudate nucleus involvement in an egocentric spatial task: Return from passive transport , 1983 .

[26]  C. Pallis IMPAIRED IDENTIFICATION OF FACES AND PLACES WITH AGNOSIA FOR COLOURS , 1955, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  P. Faglioni,et al.  Topographical amnesia. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  S. Levine,et al.  Ontogeny of type I and type II corticosteroid receptors in the rat hippocampus. , 1988, Brain research.

[29]  E. Tolman There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[30]  M. Bohn Granule cell genesis in the hippocampus of rats treated neonatally with hydrocortisone , 1980, Neuroscience.

[31]  B. McEwen,et al.  Glucocorticoid-sensitive hippocampal neurons are involved in terminating the adrenocortical stress response. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. Black,et al.  Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats ☆ ☆☆ , 1980 .

[33]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Dopamine depletion, stimulation or blockade in the rat disrupts spatial navigation and locomotion dependent upon beacon or distal cues , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  L. Nadel,et al.  Early handling increases hippocampal long-term potentiation in young rats , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Morphologic and behavioral effects of perinatal glucocorticoid administration , 1982, Physiology & Behavior.

[36]  C. T. Morgan,et al.  Handbook of psychological research on the rat. , 1951 .

[37]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[38]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Ontogeny of spatial navigation behaviors in the rat: dissociation of "proximal"- and "distal"-cue-based behaviors. , 1987, Behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  M. Stanton,et al.  Maternal deprivation potentiates pituitary-adrenal stress responses in infant rats. , 1988 .

[40]  B. McEwen,et al.  Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure reduces hippocampal neuron number: implications for aging , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Stanton,et al.  Maternal modulation of infant glucocorticoid stress responses: Role of age and maternal deprivation , 1988, Psychobiology.

[42]  L. Nadel,et al.  Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[43]  Early postnatal handling alters glucocorticoid receptor concentrations in selected brain regions. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.