The effects of single‐message single‐source mixed word‐of‐mouth on product attitude and purchase intention

Purpose – This study seeks to investigate how attitude towards and purchase intention of a product will be affected by involvement level and presentation order of positive and negative word‐of‐mouth (WOM) information when presented in a single‐message single‐source context.Design/methodology/approach – Two studies were conducted with undergraduates of a top Asian university with sample sizes of 221 and 253 using experimental setups.Findings – It was found that subjects tend to base their evaluations more on later information than earlier information regardless of involvement level. This recency effect was consistently found across the product categories of tourist destination and restaurant in both studies.Research limitations/implications – The main limitation is that the manipulation of involvement level might not have been strong enough. Despite obtaining differences between high and low involvement levels in the pretest for both products, the difference was found again in only the restaurant category ...

[1]  P. Herr,et al.  Order Effects in Consumer Judgment, Choice, and Memory: the Role of Initial Processing Goals , 1990 .

[2]  C. Vogt,et al.  The Effects of Integrating Advertising and Negative Word‐of‐Mouth Communications on Message Processing and Response , 1995 .

[3]  J. Inman,et al.  Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value , 1997 .

[4]  H. Bansal,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context , 2000 .

[5]  R. Mizerski.  An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information , 1982 .

[6]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[7]  C. Sharpley,et al.  Varying the Order in which Positive and Negative Information Is Presented: Effects on Counselors' Judgments of Clients' Mental Health. , 1989 .

[8]  Helen V. Lewis,et al.  Selectivity of Negative Bias in Impression Formation , 1982 .

[9]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  The influence of quantity of information and goal framing on decision , 1995 .

[10]  Frederick A. Russ,et al.  Errors in recall and judgment: the effect of information availability , 1989 .

[11]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[12]  Cornelia Pechmann,et al.  Predicting when Two-Sided Ads will be More Effective than One-Sided Ads: The Role of Correlational and Correspondent Inferences , 1992 .

[13]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective , 1994 .

[14]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Some Limits on the Potency of Word-Of-Mouth Information , 1989 .

[15]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  The Role of Brand Familiarity on the Impact of Word-Of-Mouth Communication on Brand Evaluations , 1999 .

[16]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases , 1993 .

[17]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[18]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.