Brokerage and balance: Creating an effective organizational interface for product modularization in multinational R&D

Despite numerous studies on modularity, the modularization processes have received less attention. In the global context, product modularity can be leveraged to satisfy heterogeneous market requirements across countries with low costs. Through a longitudinal case study of HomeTech, we examined how multinational R&D created an effective organizational interface to facilitate recombination of its organizational units, and thus product modularization. We found that three elements of an organizational interface were established through a process composed of three phases in HomeTech R&D: regional concentration, establishing a module pool, and creating architecture leader posts. We also found that the three elements exerted the balancing effect and the brokerage effect so that the organizational interface was effective in facilitating recombination of organizational units. We contribute to the literature through showing how organizational modularity can affect product modularity within a firm. We also reveal the critical role of architecture leaders in product modularization. Finally, we enrich the organizational interface concept by highlighting the combination of elements.

[1]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Supply chain implications of modularization , 2003 .

[3]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[4]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  The Concept of Modularity in Management Studies: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[5]  Mark de Rond,et al.  On the Plasticity of Institutions: Containing and Restoring Practice Breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club , 2013 .

[6]  Surajit Kar,et al.  Managing Global R&D Operations Lessons from the Trenches , 2009 .

[7]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[8]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  The Impact of Product Modularity on New Product Performance: Mediation by Product Innovativeness , 2011 .

[9]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge, and Practice: Attempting Strategic Change Via Knowledge Grafting , 2007 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Process studies of change in organization and management : unveiling temporality, activity, and flow , 2013 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[12]  M. Hitt,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Organizational Design and Strategic Flexibility , 1996 .

[13]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change , 1990 .

[15]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[16]  Ronaldo Parente,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of modular production in the Brazilian automobile industry: a grounded theory approach , 2007 .

[17]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Duality between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the Mirroring Hypothesis , 2011 .

[18]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[19]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Modularity‐as‐Property, Modularization‐as‐Process, and ‘Modularity'‐as‐Frame: Lessons from Product Architecture Initiatives in the Global Automotive Industry , 2013 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  William E. Souder,et al.  Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D/Marketing Interface , 1996 .

[22]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[23]  P. Kotler GLOBAL STANDARDIZATION—COURTING DANGER , 1986 .

[24]  Robert Pearce,et al.  New forms of organisation and R&D internationalisation among the world's 100 largest food and beverages multinationals , 2009, Research Policy.

[25]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[26]  William A. Fischer,et al.  The Coordination of Foreign R&D Activities by Transnational Corporations , 1979 .

[27]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Managing conflict at organizational interfaces , 1982 .

[28]  Magnus Persson,et al.  Managerial issues in modularising complex products , 2006 .

[29]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Barriers to knowledge seeking within MNC teams: Which differences matter most? , 2015 .

[30]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[31]  Alexander Gerybadze,et al.  Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations , 1999 .

[32]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  S. Karim Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[34]  Robert Chia,et al.  Choice, Chance, and Unintended Consequences in Strategic Change: A Process Understanding of the Rise and Fall of NorthCo Automotive , 2013 .

[35]  Anton Geyer,et al.  Managing project–system interfaces: case studies of railway projects in restructured UK and German markets , 2000 .

[36]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspective , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[38]  O. Gassmann,et al.  New concepts and trends in international R&D organization , 1999 .

[39]  Diego Campagnolo,et al.  Modularity in KIBS: The Case of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers , 2015 .

[40]  Alessandro Brun,et al.  Evaluation of product customization strategies through modularization and postponement , 2009 .

[41]  Daniel A. Wren,et al.  Interface and Interorganizational Coordination , 1967 .

[42]  Yixiong Feng,et al.  An integrated method for flexible platform modular architecture design , 2013 .

[43]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[44]  C Antoine,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity , 2013 .

[45]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[46]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[47]  G. Hoetker Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[48]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Global R&D Activities of Japanese MNCs in the US: A Triangulation Approach , 2007 .

[49]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Patterns of Modularization: The Dynamics of Product Architecture in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[50]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Interpersonal similarity and knowledge sharing within multinational organizations , 2012 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[52]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[53]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  How firms innovate through R&D internationalization? An S-curve hypothesis , 2012 .

[54]  R. Roe,et al.  The Interface of the Top Management Team and Middle Managers: A Process Model , 2011 .

[55]  R. Parente,et al.  STRATEGIC MODULARITY AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF MULTINATIONAL FIRM , 2013 .

[56]  Wendy K. Smith Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[57]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[58]  A. Tiwana Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[59]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[60]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Managing the internationalization of R&D activities , 1996 .

[61]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[63]  L. Klerkx Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector , 2009 .

[64]  J. Whyte,et al.  Aligning and Reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery , 2017 .

[65]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[66]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[67]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Organizational design mechanisms for the R&D function in a world of offshoring , 2010 .

[68]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[69]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Coordination in global R&D organizations: An examination of the role of subsidiary mandate and modular product architectures in dispersed R&D organizations , 2014 .

[70]  Stephen Tallman Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[71]  Luca Bongulielmi,et al.  A value chain oriented approach for the development of global platforms in the systems business , 2008 .

[72]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing , 2007 .

[73]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Beyond the "Mirroring" Hypothesis: Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[74]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[75]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change , 2014 .

[76]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[77]  Henrik Bresman Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2013 .

[78]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .