Carbon Footprint Modeling of a Clinical Lab

Modeling of a clinical lab carbon footprint is performed in this study from the aspects of electricity, water, gas consumption and waste production from lab instruments. These environmental impact indicators can be expressed in the form of the CO 2 equivalent. For each type of clinical test, the corresponding consumption of energy resources and the production of plastics and papers are taken into consideration. In addition, the basic lab infrastructures such as heating, ventilation, air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, lights, and computers also contribute to the environmental impact. Human comfort is to be taken into account when optimizing the operation of lab instruments, and is related to the operation of HVAC and lighting systems. The detailed modeling takes into consideration the types of clinical tests, operating times, and instrument specifications. Two ways of disposing waste are classified. Moreover, the indoor environment is modeled. A case study of the Biochrom 30+ amino acid analyzer physiological system in Alder Hey Children’s Hospital is carried out, and the methods of mitigating the overall environmental impacts are discussed. Furthermore, the influence of climate on the results is investigated by using the climate data in Liverpool and Athens in October.

[1]  Yusuf Kuvvetli,et al.  Performance analysis of a university hospital blood laboratory via discrete event simulation , 2016, Simul..

[2]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Importance of occupancy information for building climate control , 2013 .

[3]  P. Fanger.  Assessment of man's thermal comfort in practice , 1973, British journal of industrial medicine.

[4]  T. Badrick,et al.  Proposals for the mitigation of the environmental impact of clinical laboratories , 2012, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[5]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[6]  Yang Wang,et al.  Evaluation on classroom thermal comfort and energy performance of passive school building by optimizing HVAC control systems , 2015 .

[7]  Andrew F. Zhou,et al.  The ¿Green Lab¿: Power Consumption by Commercial Light Bulbs , 2011 .

[8]  Simone Baldi,et al.  An integrated control-oriented modelling for HVAC performance benchmarking , 2016 .

[9]  Peter B. Luh,et al.  Building Energy Management: Integrated Control of Active and Passive Heating, Cooling, Lighting, Shading, and Ventilation Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[11]  T. Badrick,et al.  Reducing the Environmental Impact of Clinical Laboratories. , 2017, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[12]  Ian Paul Knight.  Power demands of heating, ventilating and air conditioning components in EU buildings , 2014 .

[13]  Salwa M. Al-Masrani,et al.  Design optimisation of solar shading systems for tropical office buildings: Challenges and future trends , 2018, Solar Energy.

[14]  Philip Haves,et al.  Experimentally-determined characteristics of radiant systems for office buildings , 2018, Applied Energy.

[15]  P. Fanger,et al.  Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates , 2002 .

[16]  S. Tanabe,et al.  Comfort limits for asymmetric thermal radiation , 1985 .

[17]  Umberto Berardi,et al.  The benefits of light shelves over the daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto , 2016 .

[18]  Aghil Yousefi Koma,et al.  The comparison of some advanced control methods for energy optimization and comfort management in buildings , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[19]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Performance evaluation of radiant cooling system integrated with air system under different operational strategies , 2015 .

[20]  L. Jiang,et al.  Energy Consumption Scheduling of HVAC Considering Weather Forecast Error Through the Distributionally Robust Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[21]  Gm. Shafiullah,et al.  Modeling techniques used in building HVAC control systems: A review , 2017 .