Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[2] Sung S. Kim. The integrative framework of technology use: an extension and test , 2009 .
[3] Ofir Turel,et al. Should I e-collaborate with this group? A multilevel model of usage intentions , 2011, Inf. Manag..
[4] Hollenbeck,et al. Decision Accuracy in Computer-Mediated versus Face-to-Face Decision-Making Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[5] Marshall Scott Poole,et al. Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[6] Rieko Maruta Richardson,et al. The influence of high/low-context culture and power distance on choice of communication media: Students’ media choice to communicate with Professors in Japan and America , 2007 .
[7] K. D. Joshi,et al. Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..
[8] Douglas E. Shook,et al. RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .
[9] G. Hofstede,et al. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .
[10] C. Fornell,et al. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .
[11] Joseph S. Valacich,et al. Technology Adoption by Groups: A Valence Perspective , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[12] Ofir Turel,et al. Interdependence Issues in Analyzing Negotiation Data , 2010 .
[13] William R. King,et al. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..
[14] Richard L. Daft,et al. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .
[15] M. Maznevski,et al. Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .
[16] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems , 2000, MIS Q..
[17] Jerald Greenberg,et al. The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight , 1987 .
[18] Saonee Sarker,et al. Technology Adoption by Groups: A Test of Twin Predictions based on Social Structure and Technological Characteristics , 2006 .
[19] Ofir Turel,et al. Does virtual team composition matter? Trait and problem-solving configuration effects on team performance , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[20] Mun Y. Yi,et al. Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures , 2006, Decis. Sci..
[21] George A. Marcoulides,et al. Modern methods for business research , 1998 .
[22] Sheryl L. Shivers-Blackwell. Reactions to outdoor teambuilding initiatives in MBA education , 2004 .
[23] Juhani Iivari,et al. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..
[24] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..
[25] M. Wesson,et al. Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.
[26] David A. Harrison,et al. Meta-analysis, level of analysis, and best estimates of population correlations: Cautions for interpreting meta-analytic results in organizational behavior , 1999 .
[27] Dorothy E. Leidner,et al. Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..
[28] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[29] Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .
[30] C. Cramton. The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .
[31] J. Hollenbeck,et al. Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: the moderating effect of openness to experience. , 2002 .
[32] Kang Yang Trevor Yu,et al. Managing job seekers' organizational image beliefs: the role of media richness and media credibility. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.
[33] Yufei Yuan,et al. User Acceptance of Web-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online , 2007 .
[34] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..
[35] D. Sandy Staples,et al. Comparing Virtual Teams to Traditional Teams: An Identification of New Research Opportunities , 2006 .
[36] J HindsPamela,et al. Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams , 2005 .
[37] Petru Lucian Curseu,et al. Emergent states in virtual teams: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..
[38] Ad de Jong,et al. Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams , 2005, Manag. Sci..
[39] N. Selwyn. `Doing IT for the Kids': Re-examining Children, Computers and the `Information Society' , 2003 .
[40] G. Johns. The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .
[41] David J. Pauleen,et al. Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..
[42] Paul R. Yost,et al. Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.
[43] John W. Whiteoak,et al. The Relationship among Group Process Perceptions, Goal Commitment and Turnover Intention in Small Committee Groups , 2007 .
[44] Ronald E. Rice,et al. Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .
[45] Moez Limayem,et al. How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..
[46] E. B. Andersen,et al. Modern factor analysis , 1961 .
[47] Catherine E. Connelly,et al. Information systems research and Hofstede's culture's consequences: an uneasy and incomplete partnership , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[48] Dov Te'eni,et al. Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..
[49] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .
[50] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[51] Paul A. Pavlou,et al. Cultural Diversity and Trust in IT Adoption: A Comparison of Potential e-Voters in the USA and South Africa , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..
[52] Nick Bontis,et al. User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value , 2007, Inf. Manag..
[53] Mark A. Fuller,et al. Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[54] Ritu Agarwal,et al. Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .
[55] Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al. Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .
[56] Subhasish Dasgupta,et al. User Acceptance of E-Collaboration Technology: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2002 .
[57] Laku Chidambaram,et al. Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..
[58] Detmar W. Straub,et al. A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[59] D. Marc Kilgour,et al. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation , 2014, Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation.
[60] Philip Bobko,et al. An Investigation of the Antecedents and Consequences of Group‐Level Confidence1 , 2002 .
[61] S. Holloway,et al. Cyberkids? Exploring Children’s Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds , 2002 .
[62] Heather M. Coon,et al. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.
[63] Barbara H Wixom,et al. A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..
[64] Andrew May,et al. A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry , 2001 .
[65] Wynne W. Chin,et al. Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.
[66] Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[67] M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al. The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups , 2002 .
[68] Steven C. Currall,et al. Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication , 2003 .
[69] Viswanath Venkatesh,et al. Predicting Collaboration Technology Use: Integrating Technology Adoption and Collaboration Research , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[70] Heshan Sun,et al. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[71] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[72] Sung S. Kim,et al. Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..
[73] Alexander Serenko,et al. User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective , 2010, Inf. Manag..
[74] H. Triandis. Individualism And Collectivism , 1995 .
[75] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..
[76] G. Hofstede,et al. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .
[77] Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al. Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..
[78] Pamela J. Hinds,et al. Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .
[79] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
[80] J. McGrath. Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .
[81] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[82] Wynne W. Chin. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .
[83] M. Markus. Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .
[84] N. Kock,et al. Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
[85] Richard L. Daft,et al. Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..
[86] John Byrne,et al. Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects , 2007, Inf. Manag..
[87] Xiaolan Fu,et al. The Impact of Individualism—Collectivism, Social Presence, and Group Diversity on Group Decision Making Under Majority Influence , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[88] Vincent S. Lai,et al. The adoption and use of collaboration information technologies: international comparisons , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..
[89] S. Weisband. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .