This paper aims at exposing seven prevailing problems that have emerged in the uptake of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in design practice. The paper provides a reality check between an idealistic view on BIM and the way it is currently applied in daily use. In order to reflect on the issues at hand, the author draws from three years of doctoral research in multidisciplinary design collaboration, followed by more than two years experience as Design Technology director in a large scale architecture practice. In addition to the above, his current role as the chair of the BIM and IPD Steering Group of the Australian Institute of Architects and Consult Australia exposes the author to a broad range of cultural implications of BIM. The findings presented here illustrate that, despite major advances in the development of BIM, there are predominantly cultural roadblocks to its implementation in practice.
[1]
John S. Gero,et al.
Advances in it for building design
,
2002
.
[2]
Alexander Koutamanis.
CAAD's Seven Arguable Virtues
,
2004
.
[3]
Thomas Kvan.
The Dual Heritage of CAAD Research
,
2004
.
[4]
John L. Dettbarn,et al.
Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry.
,
2004
.
[5]
Thomas Froese,et al.
PRACTICE NOTE Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt BIM?
,
2009,
ICIT 2008.
[6]
Larry Downes,et al.
The Laws of Disruption: Harnessing the New Forces that Govern Life and Business in the Digital Age
,
2009
.
[7]
Dominik Holzer.
Optioneering in Collaborative Design Practice
,
2010
.
[8]
Randall Deutsch,et al.
BIM and Integrated Design: Strategies for Architectural Practice
,
2011
.