Four-Group Classification of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Based on Ventricular Concentricity and Dilatation Identifies a Low-Risk Subset of Eccentric Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients

Background—Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH; high LV mass [LVM]) is traditionally classified as concentric or eccentric based on LV relative wall thickness. We evaluated the prediction of subsequent adverse events in a new 4-group LVH classification based on LV dilatation (high LV end-diastolic volume [EDV] index) and concentricity (mass/end-diastolic volume [M/EDV]2/3) in hypertensive patients. Methods and Results—In the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) echocardiography substudy, 939 hypertensive patients with measurable LVM at baseline were randomized to a mean of 4.8 years of losartan- or atenolol-based treatment. Patients with LVH (LVM/body surface area ≥116 and ≥96 g/m2 in men and woman, respectively) were divided into 4 groups—concentric nondilated (increased M/EDV, normal EDV), eccentric dilated (increased EDV, normal M/EDV), concentric dilated (increased M/EDV and EDV), and eccentric nondilated (normal M/EDV and EDV)—and compared with patients with normal LVM. Time-varying LVH classes were tested for association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and a composite end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death in multivariable Cox analyses. At baseline, the LVs were categorized as eccentric nondilated in 12%, eccentric dilated in 20%, concentric nondilated in 29%, concentric dilated in 14%, and normal LVM in 25%. Treatment changed the prevalence of 4 LVH groups to 23%, 4%, 5%, and 7%; 62% had normal LVM after 4 years. In time-varying Cox analyses, compared with normal LVM, those with eccentric dilated and both concentric nondilated and dilated LVH had increased risks of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality or the composite end point, whereas the eccentric nondilated group did not. Conclusions—Hypertensive patients with relatively mild LVH without either increased LV volume or concentricity have similar risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events because hypertensive patients with normal LVM seem to be a low-risk group. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00338260.

[1]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Systolic left ventricular function according to left ventricular concentricity and dilatation in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study , 2013, Journal of Hypertension.

[2]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Serial assessment of the electrocardiographic strain pattern for prediction of new‐onset heart failure during antihypertensive treatment: the LIFE study , 2011, European journal of heart failure.

[3]  Ronald M. Peshock,et al.  A 4-Tiered Classification of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Based on Left Ventricular Geometry: The Dallas Heart Study , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Refining patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy using cardiac MRI: "brother, can you spare a paradigm?". , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  R. Devereux,et al.  Impact of left ventricular geometry on prognosis in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (the LIFE study). , 2008, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Solomon,et al.  Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass and geometry following myocardial infarction: the VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) Echocardiographic Study. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  W. Elliott Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated with Less Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Hypertensive Patients , 2008 .

[9]  P. Okin,et al.  Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated with Less Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Hypertensive Patients , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  F. Cuccurullo,et al.  Prognostic value of left ventricular concentric remodeling in uncomplicated mild hypertension. , 2004, American journal of hypertension.

[12]  M. Nieminen,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[13]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Heart failure in pressure overload hypertrophy. The relative roles of ventricular remodeling and myocardial dysfunction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Geometry in Hypertensive Patients with Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study , 2001, Blood pressure.

[15]  R. Pini,et al.  Impact of Arterial Stiffening on Left Ventricular Structure , 2000, Hypertension.

[16]  B. Howard,et al.  Prevalence and correlates of aortic regurgitation in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R. Devereux,et al.  Impact of different partition values on prevalences of left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric geometry in a large hypertensive population : the LIFE study. , 2000, Hypertension.

[18]  R. Devereux,et al.  Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: the PRESERVE study. Prospective Randomized Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Cooper,et al.  Influence of left ventricular geometric patterns on prognosis in patients with or without coronary artery disease. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Nieminen,et al.  The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) in Hypertension study: rationale, design, and methods. The LIFE Study Group. , 1997, American journal of hypertension.

[21]  G. Reboldi,et al.  Adverse prognostic significance of concentric remodeling of the left ventricle in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular mass. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  P Kligfield,et al.  Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Association of carotid atherosclerosis and left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  J. Laragh,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  J. Laragh,et al.  Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[27]  R. Cody,et al.  Comparative accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic methods for clinical stroke volume determination. , 1990, American heart journal.

[28]  D E Manyari,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  N. Reichek,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  N Reichek,et al.  Reliable estimation of peak left ventricular systolic pressure by M-mode echographic-determined end-diastolic relative wall thickness: identification of severe valvular aortic stenosis in adult patients. , 1982, American heart journal.

[31]  H. Gutgesell,et al.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Size and Function by Echocardiography Results in Normal Children , 1977, Circulation.

[32]  R Gorlin,et al.  Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  Cameron L. Fincher Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? , 1971 .

[34]  A J LINZBACH,et al.  Heart failure from the point of view of quantitative anatomy. , 1960, The American journal of cardiology.