Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk‐based assessments

SUMMARY The conditional spectrum (CS, with mean and variability) is a target response spectrum that links nonlinear dynamic analysis back to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for ground motion selection. The CS is computed on the basis of a specified conditioning period, whereas structures under consideration may be sensitive to response spectral amplitudes at multiple periods of excitation. Questions remain regarding the appropriate choice of conditioning period when utilizing the CS as the target spectrum. This paper focuses on risk-based assessments, which estimate the annual rate of exceeding a specified structural response amplitude. Seismic hazard analysis, ground motion selection, and nonlinear dynamic analysis are performed, using the conditional spectra with varying conditioning periods, to assess the performance of a 20-story reinforced concrete frame structure. It is shown here that risk-based assessments are relatively insensitive to the choice of conditioning period when the ground motions are carefully selected to ensure hazard consistency. This observed insensitivity to the conditioning period comes from the fact that, when CS-based ground motion selection is used, the distributions of response spectra of the selected ground motions are consistent with the site ground motion hazard curves at all relevant periods; this consistency with the site hazard curves is independent of the conditioning period. The importance of an exact CS (which incorporates multiple causal earthquakes and ground motion prediction models) to achieve the appropriate spectral variability at periods away from the conditioning period is also highlighted. The findings of this paper are expected theoretically but have not been empirically demonstrated previously. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  SEISMIC FRAGILITY OF RC STRUCTURAL WALLS: DISPLACEMENT APPROACH , 2001 .

[2]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[3]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part II: Intensity‐based assessments and evaluation of alternative target spectra , 2013 .

[4]  J. Baker,et al.  GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES FOR COLLAPSE CAPACITY PREDICTION: CHOICE OF OPTIMAL SPECTRAL PERIOD AND EFFECT OF SPECTRAL SHAPE , 2006 .

[5]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data , 2008 .

[6]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses | NIST , 2011 .

[8]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[9]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection , 2011 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[11]  J. Baker,et al.  Statistical Tests of the Joint Distribution of Spectral Acceleration Values , 2008 .

[12]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance , 2011 .

[13]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology To Performance-Based Engineering , 2020 .

[14]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models , 2008 .

[15]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Improved probabilistic quantification of drift demands for seismic evaluation , 2007 .

[16]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[17]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[18]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Prediction of spatially distributed seismic demands in specific structures: Structural response to loss estimation , 2009 .

[19]  S. Harmsen,et al.  Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models , 2013 .

[20]  E. Miranda,et al.  Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2004 .

[21]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Prediction of spatially distributed seismic demands in specific structures: Ground motion and structural response , 2009 .

[22]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Site-Specific Design Spectra for Vertical Ground Motion , 2011 .

[23]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety and Behavior of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings , 2007 .

[24]  B. Bradley A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground‐motion selection , 2010 .

[25]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear Responses , 1998 .

[26]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[27]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[28]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[29]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probability-based seismic response analysis , 2005 .

[30]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[31]  Jianlin Song,et al.  Seismic Reliability of Special Moment Steel Frames with Welded Connections: I , 1999 .

[32]  B. Bradley A ground motion selection algorithm based on the generalized conditional intensity measure approach , 2012 .

[33]  Brendon A. Bradley OpenSHA implementation of the GCIM approach for ground motion selection , 2010 .

[34]  Brendon A. Bradley The seismic demand hazard and importance of the conditioning intensity measure , 2012 .

[35]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures , 1999 .

[36]  J. Baker,et al.  Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection , 2006 .