Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates.

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening and oto-admittance testing (678 Hz probe tone) were performed on both ears of 84 special care neonates, as part of a larger study of middle-ear effusion in neonates and infants. OAE results, tympanometry, and acoustic reflex results are all strongly and significantly associated. No evidence was found of any maturational effects in the results. Based on the findings, a tentative classification scheme for neonatal tympanograms is suggested. We conclude that 678 Hz tympanometry is a useful indicator of middle-ear status in very young babies, and that middle-ear effusion does strongly affect OAEs in neonates. OAEs are also strongly affected by negative middle-ear pressure (MEP), and mean MEP in ears failing OAE screens was significantly more negative than in those passing. The prevalence of abnormal tympanometry, which may indicate middle-ear effusion or dysfunction, was 20% of ears (29% of babies) in this group. It appears that middle-ear effusion could account for about half of the ears failing an OAE screen on the special care baby unit. We also find that length of stay on the special care baby unit is an important risk factor for development of middle-ear effusion: those on the unit for over 30 days have about four times the risk of bilateral abnormal tympanometry.

[1]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions testing in young children : middle-ear influences , 1994 .

[2]  A R Thornton,et al.  External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[3]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Distortion‐Product and Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions of Preterm and Full‐Term Infants , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[4]  B. Vohr,et al.  External and middle ear status related to evoked otoacoustic emission in neonates. , 1993, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[5]  B. Vohr,et al.  Factors Affecting the Interpretation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Results in Neonatal Hearing Screening , 1993 .

[6]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Influence of Otitis Media on Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Children , 1992 .

[7]  M. Brocaar,et al.  Growth of evoked otoacoustic emissions during the first days postpartum. A preliminary report. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  H. Erwig,et al.  Zur Evaluation transitorisch evozierter otoakustischer Emissionen bei Kindern mit Tubenbelüftungsstörungen , 1991 .

[9]  C. R. Kennedy,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn. , 1991, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[11]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Click Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Screening , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[12]  E. Tessitore,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion in children of different age groups. , 1988, Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[13]  C. Marchant,et al.  Objective diagnosis of otitis media in early infancy by tympanometry and ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. , 1986, The Journal of pediatrics.

[14]  M. Bennett,et al.  The neonatal acoustic reflex. , 1980, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  T. Balkany,et al.  Otitis media in the neonatal intensive care unit. , 1978, Pediatrics.

[16]  T. Balkany,et al.  Middle ear effusions in neonates , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  S. Pelton,et al.  Tympanometry in the diagnosis of middle-ear effusion. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Klein,et al.  Otitis Media in the Newborn Infant , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.