A filtering strategy for interest point detecting to improve repeatability and information content

This paper compares several stereo image interest point detectors with respect to their repeatability and information content through experimental analysis. The Harris-Laplace detector gives better results than other detectors in areas of good texture; however, in areas of poor texture, the HarrisLaplace detector may be not the best choice. A featurerelated filtering strategy is designed for the Harris-Laplace detector (as well as the standard Harris detector) to improve the repeatability and information content for imagery with both good and poor texture: (a) the local information entropy is computed to describe the local feature of the image; and (b) the redundant interest points are filtered according to the interest strength and the local information entropy. After the filtering process, the repeatability and information content of the final interest points are improved, and the mismatching then can be reduced. This conclusion is supported by experimental analysis with actual stereo images.

[1]  Hans P. Morevec Towards automatic visual obstacle avoidance , 1977, IJCAI 1977.

[2]  Hans P. Moravec Towards Automatic Visual Obstacle Avoidance , 1977, IJCAI.

[3]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[4]  Wolfgang Förstner,et al.  A Framework for Low Level Feature Extraction , 1994, ECCV.

[5]  Roger Mohr,et al.  Accuracy in image measure , 1994, Other Conferences.

[6]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Global measures of coherence for edge detector evaluation , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[7]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[8]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Comparing salient point detectors , 2001, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2001. ICME 2001..

[9]  Huaifeng Zhang,et al.  Control Points Based Semi-Dense Matching , 2002 .

[10]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Representation of local geometry in the visual system , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Michael Brady,et al.  Saliency, Scale and Image Description , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[12]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  An Affine Invariant Salient Region Detector , 2004, ECCV.

[15]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  J. Gong,et al.  Triangulation of Well-Defined Points as a Constraint for Reliable Image Matching , 2005 .

[17]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A performance evaluation of local descriptors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.