Exploiting body biasing for leakage reduction: A case study

In modern System-on-Chip (SoC) designs, the fulfillment of power constraints is one of the most important and challenging tasks. In this framework, the use of both voltage scaling and body biasing techniques is a mainstream strategy largely used for leakage power reduction. This work presents a case study to evaluate the impact of these techniques on an industrial microprocessor-based design. We analyze the impact of body biasing in terms of area penalties and routing efforts. Furthermore, a complete analysis flow is proposed to evaluate the achievable leakage reduction and the expected performance degradation. In order to overcome the limited spectrum of operating configurations covered by a given library set, we propose a practical and effective methodology based on a standard digital design and characterization flow. By using this procedure, a designer can efficiently evaluate the most appropriate leakage/timing trade-offs, and consequently determine the best supply voltage and biasing configurations to implement the design. The experimental results on our testcase demonstrate that body biasing leads to a leakage reduction up to six times with respect to the standard reference supply voltage configuration.

[1]  S. Borkar,et al.  Dynamic-sleep transistor and body bias for active leakage power control of microprocessors , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC..

[2]  Roberto Guerrieri,et al.  A Heterogeneous Digital Signal Processor for Dynamically Reconfigurable Computing , 2010, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[3]  J. Tschanz,et al.  Effectiveness of adaptive supply voltage and body bias for reducing impact of parameter variations in low power and high performance microprocessors , 2002, 2002 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.02CH37302).

[4]  Shin'ichiro Mutoh,et al.  1-V power supply high-speed digital circuit technology with multithreshold-voltage CMOS , 1995, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[5]  Trevor Mudge,et al.  Combined dynamic voltage scaling and adaptive body biasing for lower power microprocessors under dynamic workloads , 2002, ICCAD 2002.

[6]  Vivek De,et al.  Effectiveness of reverse body bias for leakage control in scaled dual Vt CMOS ICs , 2001, ISLPED '01.

[7]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Technology scaling behavior of optimum reverse body bias for standby leakage power reduction in CMOS IC's , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (Cat. No.99TH8477).

[8]  James Kao,et al.  Subthreshold leakage modeling and reduction techniques , 2002, ICCAD 2002.

[9]  Vivek De,et al.  Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.02CH37315).

[10]  Saibal Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Leakage current mechanisms and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Leakage power analysis and reduction: models, estimation and tools , 2005 .