The orientation of the visuotectal map in Xenopus: developmental aspects.

Rotations and translocations of the eye anlage were performed in Xenopus embryos of stages ranging from 21/22 to 30. Some of the operations involved grafting wild-type eye anlagen into albino host orbits. Operations were performed under a variety of operating media and conditions. In later larval life, or after metamorphosis, the visuotectal maps from the operated eyes were recorded electrophysiologically. Results fell into two classes. In the majority, the orientation of the visuotopic map corresponded to the orientation of the eye at the time of recording. In the minority the visuotopic maps were 'compound', consisting of two parts each with its own independent orientation. The organization of the compound maps was such that one component was oriented in correspondence with the orientation of the eye, while the other component was normally oriented. Histological analysis and observations on genetically marked grafts indicated that the component parts of the compound eye were of dual cellular origin. The component giving the rotated (or translocated) map belonged to the originally operated eye tissue; whereas the component giving the normally oriented map was derived from newly grown eye tissue coming from the optic stalk. In no case was a normally oriented map obtained from a rotated or translocated eye. The results are discussed in relation to mechanisms proposed to account for the determination of map-related retinal specificity.

[1]  L. Stone Polarization of the retina and development of vision , 1960 .

[2]  M. Jacobson Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[3]  R. Hunt,et al.  Development and stability of postional information in Xenopus retinal ganglion cells. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells: Specification of Central Connections in Larval Xenopus laevis , 1967, Science.

[5]  R. Hunt,et al.  The origins of nerve-cell specificity. , 1973, Scientific American.

[6]  R. Hunt,et al.  Specification of positional information in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus: assays for analysis of the unspecified state. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  S. Goldberg Progressive fixation of morphological polarity in the developing retina. , 1976, Developmental biology.

[8]  S. Goldberg Polarization of the avian retina. Ocular transplantation studies , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  V. French,et al.  Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. , 1976, Science.

[10]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The development of half‐eyes in Xenopus tadpoles , 1975 .

[11]  L. Stone Development, polarization and regeneration of the ventral iris cleft (remnant of choroid fissure) and protractor lentis muscle in urodele eyes. , 1966, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[12]  Cross-species axial signaling, with realignment of retinal axes, in embryonic Xenopus eyes. , 1978, Developmental biology.

[13]  J. Hollyfield,et al.  Specification of retinal central connections in Rana pipiens before the appearance of the first post‐mitotic ganglion cells , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.